External Article

PowerShell Desired State Configuration: Automating and Monitoring Pull mode

The Pull mode of Desired State Configuration (DSC) is more complicated to implement because you need to meticulously manage the MOF files and their naming conventions so as to ensure that you deploy your DSC configurations correctly. In this first article of a two-part series, Nicolas Prigent describes how you can best automate this, and then in a second part on monitoring DSC he describes techniques to help you to use the pull mode as a regular part of your admin work.

External Article

Using SQL Compare with Dynamic Data Masking

Dynamic Data Masking is an exciting new feature in SQL Server 2016, allowing DBAs to centrally set a mask that is returned for a table column instead of the actual data, limiting what information is returned to certain users in a consistent and reliable way. What’s more, Redgate SQL Compare safely and reliably handles your DDM changes. Data Platform MVP Steve Jones explains more.

Blogs

Stop Using Pandas for Aggregations — Try DuckDB Instead

By

If you've ever loaded a 2 GB CSV into pandas just to run a...

Understanding Fabric Ontology

By

What problem is Fabric Ontology trying to solve? For years, most data conversations have...

QUOTENAME Basics: #SQLNewBlogger

By

Recently I ran across some code that used a lot of QUOTENAME() calls. A...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

The New Software Team

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item The New Software Team

Database Mail in SQL Server 2022

By Abdellateef Ibrahim

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Database Mail in SQL Server...

The string_agg function

By Alessandro Mortola

Comments posted to this topic are about the item The string_agg function

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

The string_agg function

We create the following table and then insert some records in it:

create table t1 (
   id int primary key,
   category char(1) not null,
   product varchar(50)
);

insert into t1 values
(1, 'A', 'Product 1'),
(2, 'A', 'Product 2'),
(3, 'A', 'Product 3'),
(4, 'B', 'Product 4'),
(5, 'B', 'Product 5');
What happens if we execute the following query in both Sql Server and PostgreSQL?
select id, 
category, 
string_agg(product, ';')
                 over (partition by category order by id
                 rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) as stragg
from t1;

See possible answers