External Article

One use case for NOT using schema prefixes

I’ve long been a huge advocate for always referencing objects with a schema prefix in SQL Server.

In spite of what may be a controversial title to many of my regular blog readers, I don’t really want you to stop that practice in most of your T-SQL code, because the schema prefix is important and useful most of the time. At Stack Overflow, though, there is a very specific pattern we use where not specifying the schema is beneficial.

Blogs

Five Ways Redshift Serverless Quietly Eats Your Budget

By

It is Friday, the queries are running, and nobody is watching the bill. That...

A Career of Memories

By

Annabel retired from Redgate Software this week. Across most of my career at Redgate,...

Rethinking Index Maintenance: Why avg_fragmentation_in_percent Is Outdated and What You Should Do Instead

By

As a SQL Server DBA with years of experience tuning production environments, I’ve seen...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

Changes, Happiness, and a Few Tears

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Changes, Happiness, and a Few...

BCP on Linux

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item BCP on Linux

You Probably Don't Need a Vector Database

By Kumar Abhishek

Comments posted to this topic are about the item You Probably Don't Need a...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

BCP on Linux

When running bcp on Linux, what is the field terminator?

See possible answers