External Article

Oracle to SQL Server, Crossing the Great Divide, Part 3

We soon learn, in SQL Server, that heaps are a bad thing, without necessarily understanding how or why. Jonathan Lewis is an Oracle expert who doesn't like to take such strictures for granted, especially when they don't apply to Oracle. Jonathan discovers much about how SQL Server places data, and concludes from his experiments that heaps perform badly in SQL Server because you cannot specify a fill factor for them.

External Article

Binary Trees in SQL

A number of hierarchies and networks are most conveniently modelled as binary trees. So what is the best way of representing them in SQL? Joe Celko discards the Nested Set solution in favour of surprisingly efficient solution based on the Binary Heap

Blogs

Rethinking Index Maintenance: Why avg_fragmentation_in_percent Is Outdated and What You Should Do Instead

By

As a SQL Server DBA with years of experience tuning production environments, I’ve seen...

Microsoft Build 2026 announcements

By

Once again there were a number of Microsoft Build announcements related to data and...

T-SQL Tuesday #199: Roundup

By

A good week ago I hosted the monthly T-SQL Tuesday blog party. I invited...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

Changes, Happiness, and a Few Tears

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Changes, Happiness, and a Few...

BCP on Linux

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item BCP on Linux

You Probably Don't Need a Vector Database

By Kumar Abhishek

Comments posted to this topic are about the item You Probably Don't Need a...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

BCP on Linux

When running bcp on Linux, what is the field terminator?

See possible answers