Technical Article

Mo-SQL

If you’re involved in the database world it’s hard to have missed the rise of the “no-sql” database products, designed to – depending on your view or the product I suppose – make databases simpler, break out of the transaction database paradigm, scale out across hundreds of machines, make it easy to change the db design (or not require one). I think some of the problems no-sql tries to solve are real, others reflect a lack of awareness/training/tools on how and why relational databases could not just solve the problem, but solve it better.

Technical Article

Ad-Hoc XML File Querying

When you need to shred just part of the data within a large XML file into a SQL Server table, the most efficient way is to just select what you need via XQuery or by using XPath, before shredding it into a table. But precisely how would you do that?

Blogs

Monday Monitor Tips: Virtual Machine Usage and Cost

By

One of the things I’ve been requesting for a number of years is cost...

Advice I Like: Respect

By

“Don’t aim to have others like you; aim to have them respect you.” –...

Blue Sky Programming – The Optimism Trap

By

Many years ago, before I joined Oracle, I was working on a major modernisation...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

SQL Art, Part 4: Happy 4th of July — A British DBA's Guide to Celebrating a War We Don't Talk About

By Terry Jago

Comments posted to this topic are about the item SQL Art, Part 4: Happy...

SQL Server Still Wins

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item SQL Server Still Wins

DBCC CHECKDB Limits I

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item DBCC CHECKDB Limits I

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

DBCC CHECKDB Limits I

When running DBCC CHECKDB on SQL Server 2025, can I include the Resource Database?

See possible answers