Clustering

External Article

Migration Guide: Migrating to SQL Server 2012 Failover Clustering and Availability Groups from Prior Clustering and Mirroring Deployments

  • Article

This paper provides guidance for customers who prior to SQL Server 2012 have deployed SQL Failover Clustering for local high availability and database mirroring for disaster recovery, and who want to migrate to SQL Server AlwaysOn. It describes the corresponding SQL Server AlwaysOn scenario and the migration paths to SQL Server AlwaysOn. It also contains the important knowledge and considerations that you must know in order to successfully migrate to a HADR solution based on SQL Server AlwaysOn technology, which implements AlwaysOn Failover Cluster Instances for high availability and AlwaysOn Availability Groups for disaster recovery.

2012-04-13

2,738 reads

Blogs

Check your regions people

By

Today I was having a nice discussion with some colleagues about Fabric and pricing/licensing...

Using Git Prune–#SQLNewBlogger

By

As I’ve been working with SQL Saturday and managing changes to events, I’ve accumulated...

Microsoft Purview new data governance features

By

Starting last week is a rollout of the public preview of a new and...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

Read Only Replica in SQL Server Standard

By Stewart "Arturius" Campbell

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Read Only Replica in SQL...

Identifying Customer Buying Pattern in Power BI - Part 1

By Farooq Aziz

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Identifying Customer Buying Pattern in...

Backup of encrypted databases failing

By Leo.Miller

I've had some backups of my encrypted databases failing with the error "BACKUP 'DBName'...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Read Only Replica in SQL Server Standard

Our environment runs using SQL Server Standard. We are implementing Availability groups. Our database has been experiencing high read volumes, so I want to let the application read the Synchronized Secondary replica, as I read that HADR does this. Can we implement this?

See possible answers