External Article

What If You Really DO Need to Shrink a Database?

You’ve heard that shrinking a database is bad because it introduces both external and internal fragmentation, it causes blocking, it causes transaction log growth while it runs, and it’s slow and single-threaded. You understand that if it’s just a matter of 10-20-30% of a database, and the database is only 100-200GB, you might as well just leave the space there, because you’re gonna end up using it anyway.

Blogs

SQL Server Journey (Part 1)- Enterprise Database 2016

By

Continued thinking about my Journey blog where we have to look back at the...

Announcements from the Microsoft Fabric Community Conference

By

A ton of new features for Microsoft Fabric were announced at the Microsoft Fabric Community...

PowerShell Remoting for SQL DBAs: WinRM + SSH Guide (Updated 2026)

By

PowerShell Remoting for SQL DBAs: WinRM + SSH Guide (Updated 2026) ...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

Identities and Sequences II

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Identities and Sequences II

Using PostgreSQL as a NoSQL Store and a Search Engine

By sabyda

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Using PostgreSQL as a NoSQL...

Is Your Time "Free"?

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Is Your Time "Free"?

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Identities and Sequences II

In thinking about the differences between the identity property and a sequence object, which of these two guarantees that there are consecutive numbers (according to the increment) inserted in a single table?

See possible answers