External Article

One use case for NOT using schema prefixes

I’ve long been a huge advocate for always referencing objects with a schema prefix in SQL Server.

In spite of what may be a controversial title to many of my regular blog readers, I don’t really want you to stop that practice in most of your T-SQL code, because the schema prefix is important and useful most of the time. At Stack Overflow, though, there is a very specific pattern we use where not specifying the schema is beneficial.

Blogs

Fabric Mirroring doesn’t start copying Rows

By

A short blog post about an issue with Fabric Mirroring (with Azure SQL DB...

JSON_OBJECTAGG is an Aggregate: #SQLNewBlogger

By

I wrote an article recently on the JSON_OBJECTAGG function, but neglected to include an...

Cultural Change: Fostering a Cost-Aware Culture in Your Organisation

By

After working deep in cloud operations, I’ve learned that FinOps isn’t really about dashboards...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

PostgreSQL String Functions Part 1

By Shivayan Mukherjee

Comments posted to this topic are about the item PostgreSQL String Functions Part 1

Working Better Under Pressure

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Working Better Under Pressure

Identities and Sequences V

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Identities and Sequences V

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Identities and Sequences V

When thinking about the identity property and sequence objects, which of these can generate values before an insert statement is executed?

See possible answers