External Article

Oracle to SQL Server, Crossing the Great Divide, Part 3

We soon learn, in SQL Server, that heaps are a bad thing, without necessarily understanding how or why. Jonathan Lewis is an Oracle expert who doesn't like to take such strictures for granted, especially when they don't apply to Oracle. Jonathan discovers much about how SQL Server places data, and concludes from his experiments that heaps perform badly in SQL Server because you cannot specify a fill factor for them.

External Article

Binary Trees in SQL

A number of hierarchies and networks are most conveniently modelled as binary trees. So what is the best way of representing them in SQL? Joe Celko discards the Nested Set solution in favour of surprisingly efficient solution based on the Binary Heap

Blogs

Houston AI-Lytics 2026–Powerpoint Slides

By

Thanks to everyone for attending my session on running a Local LLM. If you...

The Book of Redgate: Do the Right Things

By

I do believe that Redgate has been very customer focused since it’s inception. I’ve...

GenAI vs Dashboards: Not the Same (And Never Will Be)

By

There’s a question I’ve been hearing more and more lately, especially as Copilot, Fabric,...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

Warning: Could not open global shared memory to communicate with performance DLL

By water490

Hi everyone I am getting below warning when I run SSIS: Warning: 0x80049304 at...

Let's Talk Community Events!

By Pat Wright

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Let's Talk Community Events!

that one limitation in replication

By stan

Hi as shown below a replication target requires a primary key.  if we want...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Detecting Deadlocks

By default, how often is the SQL Server Database Engine checking for deadlocks?

See possible answers