Are the posted questions getting worse?

  • May experience with overseas contractors has been anything but stellar, most of them are extremely sub-par but yeah they are cheap to hire and of course you get exactly what you are not paying for and that is quality 99 times out of 100. So yeah, I am talking poor-quality at best and it simply goes downhill from there unless you are extremely lucky.

  • I find hiring anyone is very hit and miss. Whether in tech, or on the ranch.

  • Jeff Moden wrote:

    Michael L John wrote:

    Jeff Moden wrote:

    I'm thinking that you need to be more clear on the job description that you use to hire people... a LOT more clear.  For more than just the most obvious reason, this is some scary stuff you just posted. 😀

    Hire?  These are all contractors.  We send out a "we need this done" request and they give is people.

    Three words.... BWAAA-HAAA-HAAA!

    Michael L John wrote:

    I guess we need to clarify the documentation.

    Apparently so! 😀  Lordy!

    I'm not telling you anything new but I have to say it out loud for others.  You need to do code reviews early and often, even if the code is all in-house.

    He he he, the old rule still applies, be careful what you ask for and more importantly how you ask for it!

    😎

    One could partially phrase this as "linguistical ambiguity" 😉

  • Steve Jones - SSC Editor wrote:

    I find hiring anyone is very hit and miss. Whether in tech, or on the ranch.

    Well said.  This thread, as well as many others, are filled with interview horror stories.

    The thing I wonder is, ok, these folks didn't get past our screening.  How many places WILL they succeed at?

    Without starting a huge discussion of incompetence at many many organizations, and excluding the politicians, how many completely unqualified individuals are holding positions where the decisions they make affect peoples lives?

    Michael L John
    If you assassinate a DBA, would you pull a trigger?
    To properly post on a forum:
    http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/61537/

  • Michael L John wrote:

    Without starting a huge discussion of incompetence at many many organizations, and excluding the politicians, how many completely unqualified individuals are holding positions where the decisions they make affect peoples lives?

    Probably lots. Too many companies don't train people well, especially managers. I think too many people get some responsibility and we let them continue, even when they don't prove successful or skilled. Then we don't improve their skills.

    Shows how much slop is in business.

    I'd also say that I look at the reverse side often as well. We screen out people because we don't like the way they look/talk/have experience/etc. when they could do the job. I've had some people who could do a job well, but they were very socially awkward or didn't communicate well.  I wondered how they got hired, and think they might struggle to get hired again, but they do a good enough job.

    I've learned to appreciate diversity more and differences, not being as judgy when someone doesn't work or interact as I wish they did. If they accomplish the tasks well, that might be enough.

  • Steve Jones - SSC Editor wrote:

    I've learned to appreciate diversity more and differences, not being as judgy when someone doesn't work or interact as I wish they did. If they accomplish the tasks well, that might be enough.

    Yeah the old adage holds true, there is usually more than one way to skin a cat. The question just boils down to, did it get done in a timely manner, did it produce the level of quality needed (or better),  and could they easily repeat this with similar situation and/or a different situation?

    My dad found out that sometimes the best folks for a job are not in the job they would excel the most at, and it takes good management to spot this and then make suggestions and facilitate the movement to the position that they and the employee feel that the employee would function that best at. He did this with his company, where they reduced the number of employees by about 25% but increased the output by about 50% and increased job satisfaction by leaps and bounds because everyone was really enjoying what they were doing.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by Dennis Jensen. Reason: clarification
  • I've just reported one of those AI-generated "SQL Server is good because" essay posts as spam. Do others agree that this is the right thing to do?


  • Phil Parkin wrote:

    I've just reported one of those AI-generated "SQL Server is good because" essay posts as spam. Do others agree that this is the right thing to do?

    I think it is absolutely the right thing!

    😎

  • Phil Parkin wrote:

    I've just reported one of those AI-generated "SQL Server is good because" essay posts as spam. Do others agree that this is the right thing to do?

    Yes. I've reported some of those already.

  • frederico_fonseca wrote:

    Phil Parkin wrote:

    I've just reported one of those AI-generated "SQL Server is good because" essay posts as spam. Do others agree that this is the right thing to do?

    Yes. I've reported some of those already.

    My take on this is that those are socially engineered side attacks, building "presence without content"

    😎

     

  • Phil Parkin wrote:

    I've just reported one of those AI-generated "SQL Server is good because" essay posts as spam. Do others agree that this is the right thing to do?

    Yes, but do you have a link?

  • Steve Jones - SSC Editor wrote:

    Phil Parkin wrote:

    I've just reported one of those AI-generated "SQL Server is good because" essay posts as spam. Do others agree that this is the right thing to do?

    Yes, but do you have a link?

    Sure. Here are a couple I've reported recently:

    https://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/topic/exploring-the-exciting-features-of-sql-server-2022-for-developers

    https://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/topic/exploring-the-power-of-sql-server

     


  • For what it's worth, I agree... those "presence with no content" posts (as Eirikur has si very appropriately labeled them) are an abuse of both AI chatbots and this site.

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.

    Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.


    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)

  • Dennis Jensen wrote:

    My dad found out that sometimes the best folks for a job are not in the job they would excel the most at, and it takes good management to spot this and then make suggestions and facilitate the movement to the position that they and the employee feel that the employee would function that best at.

    I've been on the recieving end of that boat, put in a job that I didn't enjoy, with no clear guidance on just WHAT I was suppossed to be doing.  Hated it, finally got moved back to what I'd been doing before and was much happier.

  • Phil Parkin wrote:

    Steve Jones - SSC Editor wrote:

    Phil Parkin wrote:

    I've just reported one of those AI-generated "SQL Server is good because" essay posts as spam. Do others agree that this is the right thing to do?

    Yes, but do you have a link?

    Sure. Here are a couple I've reported recently:

    https://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/topic/exploring-the-exciting-features-of-sql-server-2022-for-developers

    https://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/topic/exploring-the-power-of-sql-server

    Thanks, I banned the user. Looks like more whack-a-mole

Viewing 15 posts - 66,376 through 66,390 (of 66,815 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply