External Article

Representing Hierarchical Data for Mere Mortals

Why is it that we use XML, but with so little enthusiasm when it does so much, and is so feature-rich? Phil Factor argues that there are better ways of doing it, more complete than JSON, but easier to read than XML. To try to convince you, he gives a set of flying demos, using PowerShell and his PSYaml module, to illustrate how YAML can let you work faster, and more accurately.

Blogs

Understanding Fabric Ontology

By

What problem is Fabric Ontology trying to solve? For years, most data conversations have...

QUOTENAME Basics: #SQLNewBlogger

By

Recently I ran across some code that used a lot of QUOTENAME() calls. A...

When growing companies outgrow Excel

By

There are some telltale signs that your growing business has outgrown Excel for your...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

Stairway to Reliable Database Deployment Level 3 – Rehearsing Changesets Across Environments

By Massimo Preitano

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Stairway to Reliable Database Deployment...

QUOTENAME Quote Parameters

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item QUOTENAME Quote Parameters

Limit the Blast Radius

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Limit the Blast Radius

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

QUOTENAME Quote Parameters

When I use QUOTENAME(), I can optionally provide the character used to surround the string in the result. Can I use any character?

See possible answers