External Article

Understanding the SQL Server 2012 BI Semantic Model (BISM)

SQL Server 2012 introduced an unified BI Semantic Model (BISM) which is based on some of the existing as well as some new technologies. This model is intended to serve as one model for all end user experiences for reporting, analytics, scorecards, dashboards, etc. In this tip, I will talk in detail about the new BISM, how it differs from earlier the earlier Unified Dimensional Model (UDM) and how BISM lays down a foundation for future.

External Article

SQL Server Transaction Log Fragmentation: a Primer

Generally, you will have no need to worry about the number of virtual log files in your transaction log. However, if you use the default settings for 'auto-grow', you can end up with such 'fragmentation' in your transaction log as to affect performance noticably. How can this be avoided? How can you tell it's a problem? What do you do about it? Greg explains.

Blogs

Stop Using Pandas for Aggregations — Try DuckDB Instead

By

If you've ever loaded a 2 GB CSV into pandas just to run a...

Understanding Fabric Ontology

By

What problem is Fabric Ontology trying to solve? For years, most data conversations have...

QUOTENAME Basics: #SQLNewBlogger

By

Recently I ran across some code that used a lot of QUOTENAME() calls. A...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

The New Software Team

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item The New Software Team

Database Mail in SQL Server 2022

By Abdellateef Ibrahim

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Database Mail in SQL Server...

The string_agg function

By Alessandro Mortola

Comments posted to this topic are about the item The string_agg function

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

The string_agg function

We create the following table and then insert some records in it:

create table t1 (
   id int primary key,
   category char(1) not null,
   product varchar(50)
);

insert into t1 values
(1, 'A', 'Product 1'),
(2, 'A', 'Product 2'),
(3, 'A', 'Product 3'),
(4, 'B', 'Product 4'),
(5, 'B', 'Product 5');
What happens if we execute the following query in both Sql Server and PostgreSQL?
select id, 
category, 
string_agg(product, ';')
                 over (partition by category order by id
                 rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) as stragg
from t1;

See possible answers