Viewing 15 posts - 18,181 through 18,195 (of 39,936 total)
No, the files are the same, the transactions are the same. The difference is only the SQL Server executable files.
September 21, 2010 at 10:14 am
I didn't get the package myself, but there should be some documentation in there. The SNAC is for clients, and perhaps there's an issue with clients that connect to a...
September 21, 2010 at 10:10 am
Eric Russell 13013 (9/21/2010)
September 21, 2010 at 10:07 am
I would bet there will be something in the Chicago area, or nearby, in the next year.
September 21, 2010 at 10:03 am
Paul White NZ (9/21/2010)
jcrawf02 (9/21/2010)
I'm with Bob on this one, not sure I fully understand all the requests, but the ones I got look useful to me.
Look useful and interesting,...
September 21, 2010 at 10:02 am
Paul White NZ (9/21/2010)
The current SQL development model is to address a small number of main product features in each new major release. The downside to that is that...
September 21, 2010 at 9:55 am
Joe Johnson-482549 (9/21/2010)
On the comment you made about hoping an architect doesn't disclude something because it is new ... we do this all of the time due to...
September 21, 2010 at 9:45 am
mtillman-921105 (9/21/2010)
September 21, 2010 at 9:43 am
I never append. You are risking your databases in one file, and if something happens to any part of that file, you could be completely without backups. I always use...
September 21, 2010 at 6:55 am
I would agree with Geoff. The master/model/msdb databases shouldn't see a lot of activity, so they don't need to be separate. The tempdb will, so having a separate LUN for...
September 21, 2010 at 6:51 am
I think moving to simple mode is the same thing, and cleaner. It's different, and it involves the change of code, but I think that the ALTER does the same...
September 20, 2010 at 4:41 pm
You did a good job, and posted sample code that I was thinking to post as well. Good job, Gail.
September 20, 2010 at 4:37 pm
Not surprising. Defaults can be a touch confusing and I could see why this might be an issue.
September 20, 2010 at 1:55 pm
Gail is correct, the column NULL setting doesnt' change defaults.
If you don't reference the column in your insert statement, the default should apply. For example:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[MyFirstTable](
[MyID] [int] NULL,
[MyChar] [varchar](50)...
September 20, 2010 at 1:55 pm
Perhaps you could explain what you are trying to do or why you want this? We might be able to help, or let you know if you might be viewing...
September 20, 2010 at 1:44 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 18,181 through 18,195 (of 39,936 total)