Dynamic Data Masking

SQLServerCentral Article

6 steps to a more secure SQL database

  • Article

Security is often something people think about only after they have had a problem. Given that the average cost of a data breach is $3.92 million (SecurityIntelligence 2019) and ransomware attacks have increased 97% over the past 2 years (PhishMe 2019), the "if it's not broke, don't fix it" approach can clearly be catastrophic. Here […]

(2)

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2019-10-07

9,369 reads

External Article

Using SQL Compare with Dynamic Data Masking

  • Article

Dynamic Data Masking is an exciting new feature in SQL Server 2016, allowing DBAs to centrally set a mask that is returned for a table column instead of the actual data, limiting what information is returned to certain users in a consistent and reliable way. What’s more, Redgate SQL Compare safely and reliably handles your DDM changes. Data Platform MVP Steve Jones explains more.

2016-07-21

3,492 reads

Blogs

ISACA AI Material/Exam Prep Discount (May 18 – June 30, 2026)

By

If you are considering any of the ISACA AI certs like the Advanced Artificial...

A Fabric solution can be very cost effective

By

Are you currently using Microsoft Fabric or considering migrating to it? If so, there...

Track SQL Server Configuration Changes Using the Error Log

By

Track SQL Server Configuration Changes Using the Error Log If you...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

We Are Eating Our Own Seed Corn

By dbakevlar

Comments posted to this topic are about the item We Are Eating Our Own...

Before Using AI with Business Data, Read This

By rom_c99

Artificial intelligence tools are quickly becoming part of daily business operations, from document analysis...

Designing SQL Server ETL Pipelines That Don't Break at Scale

By SQL Expert

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Designing SQL Server ETL Pipelines...

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Detecting Deadlocks Quickly

In the Database Engine, when a deadlock is detected, what does the detection interval shrink to (in time)?

See possible answers