Articles

Technical Article

SQL Server 2005: Integrating SQL, XML, and XQuery

The evolution of SQL and the XML Query Language (XQuery) continues with the work of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the InterNational Committee for Information Technology Standards (INCITS). Providers of SQL database management systems have upgraded products such as Microsoft SQL Server to support the storage and retrieval of XML documents. Microsoft has provided stored procedures and Transact-SQL extensions for working with XML. On the horizon are even more changes as Microsoft introduces SQL Server 2005. (MP3 Audio)

2005-01-13

1,665 reads

Technical Article

Understanding "Yukon" Schema Separation

Well it has finally arrived, at least in the Beta version. Microsoft's long awaited latest version of it's SQL Server product has arrived in Beta version and holds promise to be a major and successful revision of this fine product. I have had the Beta version for a few months now and one of the new security items that has intrigued me the most is the separation of users and schemas. I've worked with this form of separation before in Microsoft's chief competitor, but this article is not a comparison of the two products or the way they implement schema separation; it is an article on the basics of user/schema separation for those SQL Server DBAs who may have not worked with separated schema separation before.

2005-01-12

2,354 reads

SQLServerCentral Article

Can You Compute?

Transact-SQL in SQL Server 2000 has some interesting features, many of which most DBAs will never use. While many DBAs are famliar with the basic aggregate functions, there are a few that are advanced and not well understood. The ROLLUP and COMPUTE operators are two of these and David Poole takes a look at how these work and a practical application for them.

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2005-01-11

10,676 reads

Technical Article

Trace-scrubbing Tools

Andrew Zanevsky shares his trace-scrubbing procedures that make it easy for you to handle large trace files and aggregate transactions by type–even when captured T-SQL code has variations.

SQL Server Profiler is a veritable treasure trove when it comes to helping DBAs optimize their T-SQL code. But, the surfeit of riches (I'm reminded of the Arabian Nights tale of Aladdin) can be overwhelming. I recently had one of those "sinking" feelings when I first tried to make sense of the enormous amount of data collected by traces on a client's servers. At this particular client, the online transactions processing system executes more than 4 million database transactions per hour. That means that even a 30-minute trace that captures "SQL Batch Completed" events results in a table with 2 million rows. Of course, it's simply impractical to process so many records without some automation, and even selecting the longest or most expensive transactions doesn't necessarily help in identifying bottlenecks. After all, short transactions can be the culprits of poor performance when executed thousands of times per minute.

2005-01-11

2,003 reads

Blogs

The First Steps: Understanding the Basics of FinOps

By

As a DevOps professional, I’ve seen firsthand how cloud costs can quickly spiral out...

Monday Monitor Tips: AI Query Analysis

By

AI is everywhere. It’s in the news, it’s being added to every product, management...

AI: Blog a Day – Day 8: RAG – Retrieval Augmented Generation

By

RAG — Retrieval Augmented Generation. we have covered so far — embeddings, vectors, vector...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

would it be so terrible to install ssms on a few user desktops?

By stan

Hi, ssms is free here.   I can think of other reasons to do this...

I'm thinking about submitting some articles

By Doctor Who 2

I've written some documentation on using different Markdown types of files on GitHub. It's...

Not Just an Upgrade

By Steve Jones - SSC Editor

Comments posted to this topic are about the item Not Just an Upgrade

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Restoring On Top I

I am doing development work on a database and want to keep a backup so I can reset my database. I make some changes and want to restore over top of my changes. When I run this code, what happens?

USE Master
BACKUP DATABASE DNRTest TO DISK = 'dnrtest.bak'
GO

USE DNRTest
GO
CREATE TABLE MyTest(myid INT)
GO
USE master
RESTORE DATABASE DNRTest FROM DISK = 'dnrtest.bak' WITH REPLACE

See possible answers