Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 1,188 total)
[font="Courier New"]select floor(13.890)[/font] returns [font="Courier New"]13[/font], but just for fun, here are the results for a couple of variations in SQL 2000 (one difference from SQL 2005 is shown):
[font="Courier New"]select...
April 25, 2008 at 7:29 am
Thanks for the great editorial, Steve,
Just for fun, I tried to figure out just how full the glass pictured in your editorial is.
Given the shape of the glass, I used...
April 15, 2008 at 10:45 am
EdVassie (4/11/2008)
Only the buffer cache can use memory...
April 11, 2008 at 9:00 am
GilaMonster (4/10/2008)
laker_42 (4/10/2008)
April 10, 2008 at 9:10 am
Steven Cameron (4/9/2008)
April 9, 2008 at 8:23 am
Hugo Kornelis (4/9/2008)
I think this is a great question, though thwarted by an incorrect answer, unfortunately.
The question is great because hardly anyone knows exactly how this works. That is...
April 9, 2008 at 7:41 am
Thanks for the article, Steve. This is definitely one of those "easier said than done" jobs.
webrunner
April 8, 2008 at 7:33 am
OK, thanks! Database A (the one at the 80 level) is a SQL 2000 database that was restored onto SQL 2005, so I am inclined to leave it that way...
March 27, 2008 at 3:13 pm
SQLServerLifer (3/20/2008)
March 20, 2008 at 2:48 pm
I don't know anything about Oracle RAC, but I can bet that there are tens of thousands of DBAs who are looking for some kind of technology that would allow...
March 13, 2008 at 7:36 am
Thanks again to everyone for their help. This information will take me a little while to review, and I have already begun reading it.
One thing I would like to be...
March 4, 2008 at 10:04 am
Thanks for the replies!
I will read the link provided. Also, to Gail: We are running SQL 2005 Standard Edition. We have Lock Pages in Memory set for the SQL Server...
March 3, 2008 at 7:46 am
Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 1,188 total)