Viewing 15 posts - 31,606 through 31,620 (of 39,754 total)
LOL, dropping the server is good.
We've tended to use multiple people to move servers now that most of us are past the 20 something stage. Felt embaressed to use...
August 16, 2007 at 6:54 am
Thanks and I'll have to look around. AFAIK you can't manage processes inside SQL Server (yet). The resource governer is SS2K8 is very exciting for me. I've been asking for...
August 15, 2007 at 6:32 pm
Wow, more responses than I expected.
I think privacy is important. Maybe the definition of privacy needs to be changed and maybe our idea of what to expect should be altered,...
August 15, 2007 at 6:26 pm
Have you looked at Reporting Services? It's free and easy.
If you are scripting, and you have some code, I used to use Active Reports and it worked great.
August 15, 2007 at 9:37 am
Agree with Bob. Keep the RI, prevents errors with triggers as code changes.
August 15, 2007 at 9:36 am
Tend to agree with Erik's advice myself.
I will say that some of the research from MS on very large DBs has been splitting off entire objects (data + indexes) into...
August 15, 2007 at 9:35 am
Good point. I hadn't thought about them trying to compete by removing Google's advantage, but it makes sense.
August 15, 2007 at 9:26 am
If there are alpha codes, wouldn't "< '9999'" work? Alphas should order above that. Might help it slightly,
August 15, 2007 at 9:24 am
I believe it's distributor, publisher, subscriber order.
August 15, 2007 at 9:23 am
Some of this changes in SQL Server 2008 with resource governers that can limit work in other areas, but I don't think you can specify affinity for a specific process...
August 15, 2007 at 9:22 am
And here I was going to give some fancy T-SQL to check and then fail the step if it was a Sat.
Nice solution, sql_junkie!
August 15, 2007 at 9:21 am
You can trace the purge with Profiler and see if things are removed or moved. That would be handy to know.
Indexes might need rebuilding to remove fragmentation in either case....
August 15, 2007 at 9:20 am
select e.empname, d.departmentname, '', ''
from employee e inner join department d
on e.emp_id = d.emp_id
union
select e.empname, d.departmentname, p.ssn, p.dob
from employee e inner join department d
on e.emp_id = d.emp_id
inner join person...
August 15, 2007 at 9:19 am
I like Markus' advice. It's a workaround and will get things moving. The other thing you can try is create the login yourself and then see if you can get...
August 15, 2007 at 9:17 am
I think 64-bit will soon be the norm, so for new installations, upgrades, new servers, etc., I'd look at 64-bit. There are so many limitations with 32-bit, not the least...
August 15, 2007 at 9:16 am
Viewing 15 posts - 31,606 through 31,620 (of 39,754 total)