Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 13,838 total)
Please stop spamming. This is not the forum for that.
March 19, 2024 at 11:45 am
It's very easy to do with SmartXML. Check this example <link removed>
Marking your post as spam. Every single post you make is promoting the same solution!
March 19, 2024 at 11:42 am
Try SmartXML, it's very easy to upload data into DB with it.
This looks suspiciously like spam. To prove yourself, please explain the interaction between this product and SQL Server...
March 19, 2024 at 8:23 am
I'm actually not too concerned about opening xlsx files, as they can't contain executable code (as far as I know). I downloaded and virus-scanned this one before I opened it.
Is...
March 15, 2024 at 10:29 am
Please test. Im not getting any data for February, but it is available.
How about you testing instead? That's what I do when things aren't working as expected.
You've created a few...
March 14, 2024 at 11:59 am
I just tried this, and for me the blocking occurs, exactly as you expected.
March 14, 2024 at 10:28 am
Why have you posted this again?
Duplicate post, original here: https://www.sqlservercentral.com/forums/topic/run-time-error-at-system-runtimemethodhandle-invokemethod
March 14, 2024 at 10:20 am
Step-by-step debugging is what I would suggest.
March 14, 2024 at 10:13 am
I suggest that you compare the schemas of the temp tables with those of the permanent tables and you'll see for yourself.
Alternatively, create the temp tables explicitly (using CREATE TABLE...
March 14, 2024 at 9:56 am
easy - would help if you had created a script task (as instructed on the link) instead of a script component.
so do it correctly - script component does NOT...
March 13, 2024 at 6:15 pm
Sorry … no idea.
March 13, 2024 at 5:52 pm
At what point do you get that error? Design time, or run time?
I just created a script task and pasted the code in. It built successfully.
March 13, 2024 at 4:40 pm
That looks like the sort of error you would get if you copied a package containing a project connection from one project to another.
March 13, 2024 at 4:10 pm
You are right to consider the potential for duplicates. I can't think of an elegant (and fool-proof) way of handling the composite key – so I'd stick with Jonathan's suggestion.
March 13, 2024 at 3:59 pm
If your actual tables include a PK not mentioned here, you may be able to use that to make your row unique, which would obviate the need for a derived...
March 13, 2024 at 2:58 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 496 through 510 (of 13,838 total)