Viewing 15 posts - 46,021 through 46,035 (of 59,095 total)
Heh... But, it won't solve a bloody thing and it won't prevent the problems that you describe... people will simply get into the habit of adding WHERE 1=1 and still...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Ah... that's a slightly different story. Am I to assume that you want the digit to be inserted in the correct ascending numerical order... in other words, the 7...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Matt Whitfield (1/9/2009)
So, collectively we fixed a logic funny for you, and made it quicker to boot.Go team! 😛
"Go Team" is right!
If I may, please consider what...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 3:59 pm
Heh...bwa-heh... BWAAA-HAAA!!! Hey, Sergei... STUFF it will ya? :P:D:)
Oh dear... couldn't resist the pun. Seriously, though... that's the answer... see here...
DECLARE @SomeExistingString VARCHAR(100),
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 3:07 pm
Jack Corbett (1/9/2009)
Grant Fritchey (1/9/2009)
Jack Corbett (1/9/2009)
Steve Jones - Editor (1/9/2009)
I'm with Grant, heat, heat, heat.I like skiing, but other than that, I'd like warm weather all the time.
Denver doesn't...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Yeah... that's one thing that Oracle does do better... some of the implicit conversions. If you look in Books Online (comes with SQL Server as the help system)...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 2:41 pm
It's there... just doesn't look that way because (sorry) ... it's virtual. 😛
Actually, it sounds like a good idea. The boys in ops just virtualized all of our...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 2:31 pm
BWAA-HAAA!!! "I'll show you mine if you show me yours."
I've never looked, but I'm just betting that the BCHR is nearly 100% for cursors... 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 2:23 pm
GSquared (1/9/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 2:19 pm
In that case... see this... especially the last part where the performance tests were done...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 1:55 pm
EdVassie (1/7/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 1:48 pm
I was just getting ready to comment on how much Lynn's complexion has improved. 😛 Barry still has to wear his helmet to hide his...
By the way... where'd...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 1:31 pm
BWAA-HAA!!! I guarantee Business Intelligence won't take off because it's an oxymoron... government gives 700 billion to banks and can't account for any of it... big 3 are going...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 1:28 pm
That's absolutely the way to do it... but, I'd be tempted to just drop the ID column and add it back in as an IDENTITY column. When you add...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 12:43 pm
If I read you right, you want to use the output of a given stored procedure as input to another table. There are several ways to accomplish that......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 12:22 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 46,021 through 46,035 (of 59,095 total)