Viewing 15 posts - 46,036 through 46,050 (of 59,101 total)
In that case... see this... especially the last part where the performance tests were done...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63681/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 1:55 pm
EdVassie (1/7/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 1:48 pm
I was just getting ready to comment on how much Lynn's complexion has improved. 😛 Barry still has to wear his helmet to hide his...
By the way... where'd...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 1:31 pm
BWAA-HAA!!! I guarantee Business Intelligence won't take off because it's an oxymoron... government gives 700 billion to banks and can't account for any of it... big 3 are going...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 1:28 pm
That's absolutely the way to do it... but, I'd be tempted to just drop the ID column and add it back in as an IDENTITY column. When you add...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 12:43 pm
If I read you right, you want to use the output of a given stored procedure as input to another table. There are several ways to accomplish that......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 12:22 pm
eddy (1/8/2009)
Ps: Jeff, i'm sorry for mispelling your name, did just notice that i managed to do it twice,, stupid me :hehe:
Heh... not really a problem, Eddy... just had to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 11:32 am
Of course, the best thing to do would be to normalize the table... even if it's just "temporary". Here's how to do that... then you can select from the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 11:06 am
Man... talk about "hijacking a thread"... sorry about that, folks. It was a much needed attitude repair.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 10:12 am
Lynn Pettis (1/9/2009)
Good to see you back in a good mood! You're no fun when your grumpy!:w00t:
Opportunities to hurl some well deserved pork overhand always bring the best out...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 10:09 am
Jack is correct.
Switching gears a bit... If blocking is present and you don't want to kill the job, you may have to get people to understand that you need to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 9:59 am
BWAA-HAAA!!! ...
... "It depends". 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 9:53 am
Garadin (1/9/2009)
Had to add to it, a small reward for not allowing myself to respond the other day when I first that post :hehe:.
Oh, very well done, Seth. Thanks...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 8:25 am
BWAA-HAAA!!! Everything that comes around, goes around. Talk about nearly instant gratification... Pork chops... AWAY!! 😛
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic632886-149-1.aspx?#BM633444
I feel MUCH better, now. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 8:14 am
Now, now, Grant... that's outside of the requirements. 😉 You don't want to actually do anything more than the requirements state, especially for this OP, or you end...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 9, 2009 at 8:10 am
Viewing 15 posts - 46,036 through 46,050 (of 59,101 total)