Viewing 9 posts - 59,056 through 59,065 (of 59,065 total)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 1, 2004 at 9:01 pm
First, thanks for pointing out the difference there, Butch. Guess I better get some glasses! ![]()
And, thank you pnewhart, for pointing out just exactly...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 1, 2004 at 8:48 pm
Maybe it's just me and I really am going blind... would someone tell me what the difference is between the two lines that pnewhart put in his last post? --Jeff Moden Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.
Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to Post Performance Problems
Create a Tally Function (fnTally)
February 28, 2004 at 12:47 pm
My experience has been that 2 DELETE queries will run much faster than a single query with a BOOLEAN "OR". Also, even with the "SIMPLE" recovery method set, the deletes...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2004 at 8:52 pm
As I alluded to in my original posting...
Casting (or Converting) the date as INT or BIGINT may give you the wrong
(next day)...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2004 at 8:29 pm
The basis of sp_executesql is that it is calling a Stored Procedure in your database, somewhere. Stored Procedures are "precompiled". That is, the execution plan for the Stored Procedure was created...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2004 at 5:15 am
Jason,
Just in case you still
don't have an answer...
If you want to do the join as if TIME where not included in the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 25, 2004 at 5:00 am
Be careful... if any NULLS, answer will be NULL unless "Concatenate Nulls Yields Nulls" is turned off.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2004 at 9:06 pm
Frank,
Don't be so quick to give up on the data layer. I had a similar challenge... I've posted ALL the code including the example data and table creation. The actual...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2004 at 5:38 am
Viewing 9 posts - 59,056 through 59,065 (of 59,065 total)