Viewing 15 posts - 36,181 through 36,195 (of 59,067 total)
If you always have 3 parts, the following will do the trick. I've not tested it to see if it's any faster but I do know that 3 REVERSEs...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 6:21 pm
I wouldn't "be" a 100 years ago... I would have died 148 years ago from blood poisoning or 146 years ago from a really nasty case of double Pneumonia.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 6:08 pm
Craig Farrell (10/29/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 5:41 pm
Grant Fritchey (10/29/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/28/2010)
Brandie Tarvin (10/28/2010)
Now I'm...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 8:42 am
GSquared (10/29/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/29/2010)
Paul White NZ (10/27/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/27/2010)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (10/27/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 8:23 am
Lynn Pettis (10/29/2010)
The OP is generating a flat file, so in my opinion formatting the date in T-SQL is acceptable as there is no GUI or reporting tool.
Just for the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 8:16 am
I'll certainly Google it but we know how that sometimes goes... so let me ask... for those of you who have gone through a SOX audit on SQL Server (or...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 6:26 am
{Flat file} Ah... so I see. I missed that in the OP. Thanks, Lynn.
It really is still an issue that the original data has a non-DATETIME column...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 6:11 am
WayneS (10/28/2010)
So you've got two SQL Spackle articles already done?
I do. I also ran into a couple of problems at work recently and solved them. They're also something...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 6:08 am
Paul White NZ (10/27/2010)
Jeff Moden (10/27/2010)
Steve Jones - SSC Editor (10/27/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 29, 2010 at 6:04 am
nshah6 (10/28/2010)
Thank you !You guys are Great. I really appreciate this ! 🙂
I consider this problem RESOLVED !
Maybe so but you should consider it to be just a temporary...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2010 at 6:28 pm
Brandie Tarvin (10/28/2010)
Now I'm obsessing about my latest...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2010 at 6:07 pm
Alvin Ramard (10/28/2010)
Grant Fritchey (10/28/2010)
Brandie Tarvin (10/28/2010)
Waving to Grant across the interwebs while listening to him present on execution plans!
Oh, that was you? Sorry I didn't wave back. Man, I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2010 at 6:03 pm
Roy Ernest (10/28/2010)
Grant Fritchey (10/28/2010)
Brandie Tarvin (10/28/2010)
Waving to Grant across the interwebs while listening to him present on execution plans!
Oh, that was you? Sorry I didn't wave back. Man, I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2010 at 5:56 pm
Brandie Tarvin (10/28/2010)
<snicker> Today's Sandra and Woo[/url] offers a reversal of the Dilbert paradigm.
BWAA-HAA!!! What makes that so incredibly funny is that it's so incredibly true.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 28, 2010 at 5:48 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 36,181 through 36,195 (of 59,067 total)