Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 22,184 total)
Could be blocking. Could be resource contention. Could be differences in the amount of data returned. Could be changes in the execution plan caused by changes in parameter values and...
September 17, 2021 at 1:05 pm
It means pretty much what it says. The query you're attempting to run needs more memory than is available. I did a bunch of reading on this. It's largely a...
September 17, 2021 at 12:57 pm
Short of building dynamic T-SQL to make it happen, I'm pretty sure you can't. To individually grant permissions on objects, you need to grant them individually. One thing you can...
September 17, 2021 at 12:48 pm
Thanks for posting the solution. It's helpful to the next person who looks at the question.
September 16, 2021 at 12:22 pm
Yes, the query looks exactly like you mentioned, Michael. I like the idea of splitting by usage scenarios, especially where there seem to be a couple of the more...
September 15, 2021 at 6:35 pm
Jeff has nailed the answer. I just want to add that, yes, in Azure you can use Plan Forcing to ensure that a given plan gets used. It's part of...
September 15, 2021 at 1:20 pm
Changing the database changes the default behavior. Changing the specifics of the connection changes that connection only.
September 15, 2021 at 1:17 pm
Yep. What Phil says.
Otherwise, you can set up an Extended Events session to capture object_altered. Same goes for created and dropped.
September 15, 2021 at 1:16 pm
I have a few blog posts that show how Causality Tracking works. The concept is really simple. Things like a login and a DML statement are connected. So, group...
September 15, 2021 at 12:32 pm
So what you're doing here is creating a whole series of result sets with that dynamic query. There's not a way to put stuff together, of course. Instead, you should...
September 14, 2021 at 12:18 pm
It all depends on how the dacpac is applied. If people are just right clicking in SSMS, your level of control is zero. If there's a script that is used,...
September 10, 2021 at 12:56 pm
Hmmm... No. You'd have to mark the system in some manner. You can avoid tables by using Extended Properties. That's an easy one.
September 9, 2021 at 4:05 pm
Strong recommendation, don't take anyone's advice on licensing. Go to Microsoft. They know. Everyone else just has opinions.
For what it's worth, I agree with @Ant-Green assessment, but I'd still go...
September 9, 2021 at 3:56 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,156 through 1,170 (of 22,184 total)