Viewing 15 posts - 9,361 through 9,375 (of 9,707 total)
Perhaps, but the biggest "term" we have is 7 years. Plus, we already have plans to get off the current system in the next five years anyway.
And...
October 5, 2007 at 12:59 pm
Ha! I think I found it. Looks like a SUM( ) was probably the issue. And SQL Server didn't implictly convert it up to a smallint or...
October 5, 2007 at 12:40 pm
I have so many mathmatical expressions in this one particular query, each of which use the tinyint, that I'm not sure which one set off the problem. I'm using...
October 5, 2007 at 9:44 am
And to follow up Andras's post, Yes, you need SQL Server (or at least the client tools which connect back to the main server) installed on every machine that you...
October 5, 2007 at 8:28 am
Aaron,
Your problem is your WHERE clause.
If you're using an OUTER JOIN and then you use a WHERE clause to define something in the "inner" table (in this case your...
October 5, 2007 at 8:25 am
HA!
The twinkie comment just made my day. @=)
October 5, 2007 at 6:16 am
They must have made it out of the same material as the Great Pyramids of Giza. @=)
October 4, 2007 at 9:07 am
Ah, yes, interpretation is key with SOX, especially as the law itself is so vague.
This is one of the reasons I recommend checking with other departments within your company or...
October 4, 2007 at 5:25 am
Oh, DUH! Ninja, you're right. I do have dates outside of that range. And here I thought it was the stupid millisecond thing.
Although, how anyone came up...
October 4, 2007 at 5:19 am
Liliya,
That actually might be one of those little things that differs from auditor to auditor.
None of the local department ITS support groups in my workplace have actually been...
October 3, 2007 at 7:37 am
To be honest, we don't have an Administrative DBA. We just have a small team of 3 DBAs who do it all, Operational, Development and Administration. Yes, a...
October 3, 2007 at 4:03 am
Megan,
In the text file, I don't see anywhere where @PO is being declared or set. that might be part of your problem. Not sure if that's the sum...
September 28, 2007 at 10:39 am
Actually, I found an easier way. Apparently Access 2003 DOES allow upsizing the table structures only.
Last time I upsized a DB, it was Access 97. Talk about behind...
September 28, 2007 at 7:33 am
Really? Because when I took the 70-431 exam, the sims were timed differently from the rest of the exam.
September 28, 2007 at 7:25 am
There are new datatypes in 2k5, and text / ntext / image datatypes are due to be depreciated in the next couple of versions, but I don't think they actually...
September 28, 2007 at 7:24 am
Viewing 15 posts - 9,361 through 9,375 (of 9,707 total)