April 1, 2010 at 9:08 am
The Dixie Flatline (4/1/2010)
Hmmm.... who do we know in the neighborhood?
Do we have an active Field Agent out there? :w00t:
April 1, 2010 at 9:12 am
Paul White NZ (4/1/2010)
Grant Fritchey (4/1/2010)
There's no way I can see to comment on the article. Shame really because that shouldn't be alllowed to stand as written.I looked for that too - my frustration at not being able to comment was part of the reason I posted here.
Pinged the author. we'll see if he responds.
April 1, 2010 at 9:15 am
The Dixie Flatline (4/1/2010)
From the "About The Author" section.Eric is active in the local SQL Server Community, serving as the president of the Colorado Springs SQL Server Users Group.
Copyright 2007 TechTarget
http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid87_gci1280004,00.html
Hmmm.... who do we know in the neighborhood?
I also noticed that he was linking to an article by Denny Cherry which essentially makes the same incorrect statements about table variables. So it's a classic case of bad information being perpetuated. Hopefully, the discussion of the articles by their paying members clears that up.
Ready for another road trip? π
For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]
April 1, 2010 at 9:28 am
FYI, here's the suggestion I had sent to Steve for today's QOD:
[font="Verdana"]The undocumented command DBCC TimeWarp 'VerifyOnly'
(Select all that apply)
A - Returns the same results with SQL 2008 Enterprise Edition as "DBCC TimeWarp" with SQL 2005
B - Returns the same results with SQL 2008 Enterprise Edition as "DBCC check_db" with SQL 2000 Standard Edition
C - Is not supported with SQL Express 2005
D - Generates an error with SQL 2000 All Editions, SQL 2005 All Edition, and SQL 2008 Standard Edition
E - All of the above
F - None of the above
[/font]
What's the correct answer?
Edit: I swapped the order of answers E & F
For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]
April 1, 2010 at 9:36 am
E.
Edited, because Alvin timewarped the answers after I answered.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
April 1, 2010 at 9:42 am
GilaMonster (4/1/2010)
F.
Since I swapped the order of the answers, your answer would now be E - All of the above
For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]
April 1, 2010 at 9:43 am
E
__________________________________________________
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills
April 1, 2010 at 9:44 am
Dangit... I hoped to be one-up on Gail just once before I die. Of course if F and E were reversed, there would have been no right answer.... and I hear from Steve that NULLS have been deprecated.
__________________________________________________
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills
April 1, 2010 at 9:45 am
Usually F.
SET LANGUAGE TO hamster for E.
For fast, accurate and documented assistance in answering your questions, please read this article.
Understanding and using APPLY, (I) and (II) Paul White
Hidden RBAR: Triangular Joins / The "Numbers" or "Tally" Table: What it is and how it replaces a loop Jeff Moden
April 1, 2010 at 9:46 am
I thought "hamster" was a collation.
__________________________________________________
Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain. -- Friedrich Schiller
Stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down. -- Stephen Stills
April 1, 2010 at 9:47 am
NULLs HAVE been deprecated, haven't you heard. SQL 11 will have no NULLs, Start rewriting now, defaults required, blah, blah, april fools, new code, more work, etc. etc.
April 1, 2010 at 9:50 am
got caught by the 'quoting whilst new post pops up' trick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
April 1, 2010 at 9:52 am
Alvin Ramard (4/1/2010)
FYI, here's the suggestion I had sent to Steve for today's QOD:[font="Verdana"]The undocumented command DBCC TimeWarp 'VerifyOnly'
(Select all that apply)
A - Returns the same results with SQL 2008 Enterprise Edition as "DBCC TimeWarp" with SQL 2005
B - Returns the same results with SQL 2008 Enterprise Edition as "DBCC check_db" with SQL 2000 Standard Edition
C - Is not supported with SQL Express 2005
D - Generates an error with SQL 2000 All Editions, SQL 2005 All Edition, and SQL 2008 Standard Edition
E - All of the above
F - None of the above
[/font]
What's the correct answer?
Edit: I swapped the order of answers E & F
nasty and devious Alvin. Save it for April 01 next year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
April 1, 2010 at 9:53 am
george sibbald (4/1/2010)
got caught by the 'quoting whilst new post pops up' trick
I've had that problem too. Need to remember to always hit F5 before clicking Quote.
For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]
April 1, 2010 at 9:54 am
Steve Jones - Editor (4/1/2010)
NULLs HAVE been deprecated, haven't you heard. SQL 11 will have no NULLs, Start rewriting now, defaults required, blah, blah, april fools, new code, more work, etc. etc.
How can NULLs be NULLified in a version that doesn't support NULLs? π
For best practices on asking questions, please read the following article: Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help[/url]
Viewing 15 posts - 13,711 through 13,725 (of 66,815 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply