Viewing 11 posts - 1,111 through 1,121 (of 1,121 total)
Here's what I think.
For pure numbers, I think baseball needs the best database. I've heard that cricket is also similarly numbers-heavy.
For a sport that requires tons of data around the...
June 9, 2006 at 7:43 am
Please tell me that the real name of the man on the ticket stub was changed to protect his identity. His real name is not relevant to the article's point,...
May 22, 2006 at 7:59 am
I'm not sure where the article went out of scope, although I sympathize with your concern. The NSA article discusses important points about the risks of diving into projects without...
May 18, 2006 at 8:21 am
Part of buggy software is due to lack of enough relevant testing, no doubt. But also poor requirements management is probably the greatest cause. In turn, a big part of...
May 8, 2006 at 8:05 am
Usually I don't quibble with the question formatting/delivery, but this time I agree. One problem is the numbering vs. lettering. The other problem is that there was no "D" option...
April 14, 2006 at 8:26 am
I was rooting for George Mason and LSU too. They had amazing runs. I'm not a sports expert, but I disagree with some of the commentators I heard who said...
April 3, 2006 at 7:42 am
The synthax error seemed to me to be an archaic form of SQL error, perhaps dating from the Middle Ages. I imagine a difference in the SQL keywords, too:
March 22, 2006 at 9:49 am
I'm going with Duke -- not a stretch, of course. But I made a fairly conventional bracket even though I agree that Memphis is an appealing underdog choice. The 5-vs-12...
March 17, 2006 at 8:38 am
I go to Google first to see what's out there. Usually the results are split between:
(1) sites that have articles, such as:
SQL Server Worldwide User Group
March 10, 2006 at 8:38 am
I am confused about why people think the SQL answer is incorrect.
1. The SQL Server SIN() function uses radians.
2. 1 radian = 57.2957 degrees (approx.)
3. SELECT SIN(1) returns 0.8414709848078965.
March 3, 2006 at 9:11 am
While mentioning the version in the question would have been helpful, the question category is listed as "Category : SQL Server 2005 - TSQL" -- that's why I knew it...
February 9, 2006 at 7:49 am