Viewing 15 posts - 39,076 through 39,090 (of 39,466 total)
I agree with the two above. A couple items to think about.
1. As of right now, I have the decrpytion algorithm to decrpyt any v6.5 view/sproc/trigger. I also have 2...
November 5, 2001 at 11:54 am
November 5, 2001 at 11:49 am
November 5, 2001 at 11:48 am
Personally, it seems that not much is being said about AD all around. In fact, the last few .NET presentations I have seen haven't mentioned it at all.
Has anyone completed...
November 5, 2001 at 11:47 am
Clustered servers shouldn't give any help. Clustering is a fault tolerance, not a performance increase. The query executes on one box (still).
For partioned views, you get two types of...
November 5, 2001 at 11:44 am
I agree there isn't a good alternative. IMHO, it's poor practice to allow an application to log in without requiring a user to log in as well.
The only good solution...
November 5, 2001 at 11:40 am
Yikes, that could be a really large case statement. I'd look at some other method of handling this.
rgibbons: I used the @ symbol to give me something that wasn't used...
November 5, 2001 at 11:37 am
I think that other knuckclehead was Genghis Warren.
Glad you guys agree. This is one area that I think causes more problems than it solves.
I hate embedding logins...
November 5, 2001 at 8:27 am
Glad it will help. I've got some more details for how I handle the other side of the backups I will post soon.
Steve Jones
November 2, 2001 at 10:33 am
I tend to agree with Andy, though I dislike sharing boxes for 2 load intensive apps, especially for different clients or departments. They are always battling. In gerenal, however, you...
November 2, 2001 at 10:32 am
Ab-so-lute-leeee agree. NO WAY should developers be working with product, except as read-only to look for data.
Steve Jones
November 1, 2001 at 12:11 pm
The design book is definitely me. I go by Steve Jones, but actually I am J(ohn) Steven, so some of the distributors got it wrong.
Steve Jones
November 1, 2001 at 12:09 pm
I ahven't tried this, but perhaps using the new table datatype in SQL 2000 would work?
Steve Jones
November 1, 2001 at 12:08 pm
Maybe its even a little "job security". Don't make too many notes, Paul! 🙂
Steve Jones
November 1, 2001 at 10:29 am
Viewing 15 posts - 39,076 through 39,090 (of 39,466 total)