Viewing 15 posts - 1,591 through 1,605 (of 1,939 total)
sburcombe (6/1/2012)
June 1, 2012 at 8:21 am
Christopher Reed (5/31/2012)
Steve,I'm just curious. What was "c"? You never listed it in the editorial.
"C" was mention in the video podcast for this editorial. I watched...
June 1, 2012 at 8:15 am
cphite (5/3/2012)
Based on the above, my understanding is that you can access the reports via the ReportServer URL but not via the Reports URL... is this still the case?
Maybe...
May 11, 2012 at 2:40 pm
spivey (5/11/2012)
May 11, 2012 at 1:42 pm
Megistal (5/11/2012)
You are granted to read something if it's directly related to the work being done right now (not tomorrow...
May 11, 2012 at 1:19 pm
I don't own an e-reader, so I've no idea of their capabilities. Someday I probably will, so I'll be watching this thread with interest.
May 4, 2012 at 8:35 am
No, on the old server SSRS isn't functional at all.
May 3, 2012 at 1:35 pm
charles.byrne (5/3/2012)
May 3, 2012 at 8:21 am
Oh, so then it's no big deal. OK, thanks.
April 20, 2012 at 8:54 am
happycat, what do you mean by "be sure you don't make a bad situation worse by updating the ReportServer database"?
April 18, 2012 at 8:08 am
happycat59 (4/16/2012)
April 17, 2012 at 8:33 am
Thank you very much, Eugene, for that explanation.
April 12, 2012 at 12:34 pm
Lynn, you're absolutely right, Eugene's code works perfectly. In fact, it's amazing. I love it! It's so elegant. I remember, not too long ago, a SQL...
April 12, 2012 at 9:18 am
The DDL code that Eugene has produced illustrates what I'm talking about.
April 12, 2012 at 7:52 am
That's good information to know, Lisa, thanks.
April 11, 2012 at 10:15 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,591 through 1,605 (of 1,939 total)