Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 2,010 total)
Also, although I've not read the 2008 EULA, you can typically downgrade your license to run an older supported version... I.E. buy a 2008 license and install and use...
March 13, 2009 at 7:38 am
If you need to use that way I'd suggest you do it one of two ways...
INSERT INTO tblProject
SELECT
...
March 13, 2009 at 7:35 am
Not sure I'm a big fan of them using "real" tables in your database, as they make inadvertently drop a table that you don't want being dropped. However I...
March 12, 2009 at 6:45 am
Thanks for the excellent reply and the links, I'll have to dig into them a bit later this week.
Never really thought about using the dateadd/datediff functionality to get to dates...
March 11, 2009 at 12:51 pm
Michael any reason why you like 17530101 as opposed to 0? I'd never really thought to use the 17530101 like you are doing, but I picked up the use...
March 11, 2009 at 11:47 am
With only using the Native SQL server tools, you will need to restore a backup of the original database(db1) (+ any required differential or transaction log backups) from a time...
March 11, 2009 at 10:57 am
The way I've done this in the past has either been with a cross join as Jack suggested or you could use a union with a mostly blank dataset as...
March 11, 2009 at 9:48 am
Since it's 2k5 on server 2k3 you're using IIS. Anything to note in either a) your security event log, b) application event log, c) SQL log, or most probably...
March 11, 2009 at 9:38 am
What type of object is in your report, table, matrix, list? I'm assuming it's a matrix and as such you won't be able to sort by your column groups....
March 11, 2009 at 9:32 am
Glad we could help. Hope all goes well with your conversion.
-Luke.
March 10, 2009 at 11:22 am
Oh yeah and if you have a numbers table and don't want to keep typing 1-59 and 1-12 for your time elements you can just use your numbers table... ...
March 10, 2009 at 10:59 am
My suggestion would be this... I'm assuming your users will only be given the choice of H/M. Much of this depends on how specific you need your time entered......
March 10, 2009 at 10:56 am
Luckily for me it was a simple total that I Was doing in the matrix with the details in a table below it. I just wanted to use the...
March 10, 2009 at 6:32 am
It shouldn't need to repeat itself if the grouping is set up correctly. Perhaps, I may have miss stated the grouping you'd need...
(-1 Would be Group On: =Fields!(whatever Full-Time/PartTime...
March 6, 2009 at 12:04 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 1,036 through 1,050 (of 2,010 total)