Viewing 15 posts - 1,051 through 1,065 (of 2,010 total)
So when you are talking about a header, are you actually dealing with the header row or just a row that has the top level of your information?
What I mean...
March 6, 2009 at 11:19 am
I'm also not an expert, but like the others, I post because a) someone has helped me and b) it helps me learn and forces me to step out of...
March 6, 2009 at 10:53 am
Can you give a bit more info on how you're "hiding" the duplicates?
Perhaps you just need to take a bit better look at how you're grouping the information. Are...
March 6, 2009 at 10:27 am
Finally found my own answer...
According to this MSDN Forum, it's not available in SSRS 2005.
-Luke.
March 5, 2009 at 7:22 am
You could do this not so much with a button, but with a new report parameter...
You could create a string type parameter that allows the user to chose the format...
March 5, 2009 at 7:08 am
ok so you've got your matrix all set up and you just want to add one more column right for the goal correct?
can you add the column and specify it's...
March 4, 2009 at 1:47 pm
This is a know issue using subreports exported to excel in SSRS 2000/2005. This issue has been corrected is SSRS 2008. Additionally, you may try to rewrite your...
March 4, 2009 at 11:24 am
1st if you give us the exact error message it would go a long way towards helping us to help you. Also the version you are using woudl be...
March 4, 2009 at 11:16 am
I guess it depends on your organization...
If you're the DBA and you're in charge of code that is executed against your database, I'd assume you would have the ability to...
March 4, 2009 at 11:00 am
You've got a comma after your Case Statement in your Group BY before your HAving Clause.
Get rid of that and you should be all set.
-Luke.
March 4, 2009 at 8:21 am
no, but liquid nails works adequately well for these types of applications.
March 4, 2009 at 7:46 am
My point exactly. Gets even worse when reading code from someone who doesn't believe in uppercase key words.
-Luke.
March 3, 2009 at 1:55 pm
I agree with tnolan. There will very a very slight performance increase with <>, however I prefer that one for the reason that was added at the end...
If I'm...
March 3, 2009 at 12:40 pm
As Gus beat me to the punch, I'd just like to add to be cognizant of any FK relationships you have defined on other tables... want to make sure you...
March 2, 2009 at 11:53 am
I would also recommend Profiler and reading up on how to use it. It's an invaluable tool to have in your arsenal.
Beyond that you may want to check out...
March 2, 2009 at 11:34 am
Viewing 15 posts - 1,051 through 1,065 (of 2,010 total)