Viewing 15 posts - 8,626 through 8,640 (of 59,072 total)
Again, interesting read... I knew of the ghost process but never did a deep dive on it. I had no idea that it could be disabled and that it would...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 17, 2019 at 10:05 pm
This sounds like the ghost cleanup process is disabled - or it is lagging way behind. Is it possible that someone disabled the ghost cleanup process on that system?
Not...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 17, 2019 at 9:54 pm
Although PS can make some things easier, I wouldn't generally say that PS provides any performance advantage.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 17, 2019 at 4:32 pm
The question now is... do you understand how and why it works? Also, for future reference, this ancient but incredibly effective method is known as a "CROSSTAB". It used to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 17, 2019 at 4:31 pm
I recently implemented this procedure in our test environment, and I don't see any data in Drivespace. Not sure why it is not populating the data in Drive space...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 17, 2019 at 4:26 pm
p.s. I also verified that the Compatibility Level for the database is SQL Server 2016.
For those interested, the 3rd party database is "WhatsUp" and was created by the "WhatsUp Gold"...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 17, 2019 at 2:41 pm
Hmmm... interesting. I just found out that a 3rd party database on my system has this problem and the tables are NOT heaps. Multiple Clustered and Non-Clustered indexes have the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 17, 2019 at 2:30 pm
Good question, and I wondered the same thing. I took the defaults when I built the volumes on the S2D Pool. This query shows that the block size is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2019 at 7:30 pm
I noticed that the a.text/Query column contains: insert [dbo].[Table] select * from [dbo].[Table]
Why is that? Does the index creation literally re-insert every row in the table into itself?
The answer...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2019 at 7:17 pm
Unfortunately and based on the name of this particular forum, it looks like the OP is still using SQL Server 2005.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 16, 2019 at 1:31 pm
Yep... agreed. You weren't asking for one. That's why I made the comments I did.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 15, 2019 at 6:39 pm
I'll also state that if you have the UNIQUE index you say you do as...
-- PK or unique key is combined key(custid,procustid,team_id)
... we'd not be able to build the sample...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 15, 2019 at 6:37 pm
I work best in an environment that has a constant background noise like a 20" box fan (good source of the right tone of "pink" noise for me) to drown...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 15, 2019 at 3:59 pm
He can supply it - just needs to use SQL Sentry Plan explorer to anonymize it before posting here.
The thing is... he doesn't actually need to supply it because...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 15, 2019 at 2:26 am
I agree that the procedure need to be fixed but coming to terms with 120 TB being processed is very perflxing(how a RAM of 196 GB is processing 120...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
September 15, 2019 at 2:14 am
Viewing 15 posts - 8,626 through 8,640 (of 59,072 total)