Viewing 15 posts - 8,521 through 8,535 (of 59,072 total)
Thanks, Joe. As you've just shown, while Dr. Codd does express that it should be similar to an index, it does NOT, however, say anything explicit about it intending to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 17, 2019 at 5:03 pm
Are you doing index maintenance on this database? And, if you are, are you making the mistake of following the supposed "Best Practice" recommendation of "REORGANIZE between 10% (or 5%)...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 16, 2019 at 11:49 pm
Dr. Codd defined a surrogate key as being generated by the database engine and never exposed to the users. What he had in mind would be more like a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 16, 2019 at 11:35 pm
When you're doing an "Upsert". That is, you're checking to see if rows already exist or not to know whether you have to do an INSERT or an UPDATE.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 15, 2019 at 9:05 pm
Thanks Michael, both the reasons you mentioned are valid for SQL Accounts but Service Account and Admin Accounts are strictly with DBAs and Windows Admins.
If you're sharing...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 15, 2019 at 2:12 pm
What is simplest way to go about gathering business requirements and determining database schemas?
Create a functional flow diagram.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 14, 2019 at 11:23 pm
We went through that same issue because they went cheap on the RO node storage. They also forgot to do things like change the settings for parallelism, etc.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 14, 2019 at 1:49 pm
Thanks Michael, both the reasons you mentioned are valid for SQL Accounts but Service Account and Admin Accounts are strictly with DBAs and Windows Admins.
If you're sharing the passwords...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2019 at 4:08 pm
Maybe you can simply modify the vendor's purge job by adding OUTPUT/INTO to their deletes to write to your archive tables. It would save you from reinventing the wheel.
Be advised...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2019 at 5:03 am
Step #1 is to identify WHY you think you want to partition a table. So WHY do you want to partition whatever table you're working with? What are some of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2019 at 4:47 am
Sounds like a stupid question but what condition are the index and column statistics in?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 13, 2019 at 4:44 am
Thanks, glad you like it
I think a large part of why I like it is because it's at a really back-to-the-basics level but also has a mention of performance...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 11, 2019 at 1:47 am
Post removed... it's just not worth it anymore.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 11, 2019 at 1:16 am
Great introduction to a very useful feature, Steve. Thanks for taking the time to write it up and post it.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 10, 2019 at 5:35 pm
Why would I take up an ANSI/ISO standard with Microsoft? I don't think you understand how international standards are set. Vendors can take part in the committees, but they...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
October 9, 2019 at 11:09 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 8,521 through 8,535 (of 59,072 total)