Viewing 15 posts - 56,686 through 56,700 (of 59,069 total)
Heh... now you understand my world of pain... I've got users that think they know how to write code/design objects and developers that don't. Ouch! ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 28, 2007 at 8:09 am
Use DBCC UPDATEUSAGE... see Books Online for the details... you can do the whole database, a single table, or a single index.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 28, 2007 at 7:05 am
| I would suggest not to use T-SQL also for cooking rice and painting walls. |
I "paint the walls"...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 28, 2007 at 7:00 am
"Irony"... thanks for the reminder... I gotta iron a shirt for tomorrow's holy war with management ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 28, 2007 at 6:53 am
Well... it depends... ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 27, 2007 at 10:30 pm
Heh... Oh, I agree with you, Serqiy... no such thing as a "Universal Application". Maybe they're that "misinformed" or ... not.
Nah, it's gotta be something else. I'll try to get...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 27, 2007 at 7:14 pm
That's what the "" is supposed to do when importing into Excel... it's one of the default settings. Tell your client the "" is absolutely necessary.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 27, 2007 at 3:53 pm
| Should have sent this for a Friday poll!!
|
Didn't know there was such a thing... I'll check it out! ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 27, 2007 at 2:15 pm
Yep, thanks Antares... knew that. Not entirely sure that's what they were looking for, though. Really strange question. I think both Steve and I are right... it was one of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 27, 2007 at 2:12 pm
That's kinda where I went with it... it depends. But, I think they had something specific in mind... or, like I said, maybe a trick question to determine which "camp" I was...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 27, 2007 at 7:13 am
Dunno, Peter... I can see UDF's being a place where you'd definitely NOT want to use a stored proc... but, I really don't know what they were getting at. I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 27, 2007 at 7:11 am
Guess that's what I get when I only ask one question a year, huh?
Heh... yeah... I had a similar reaction as you did, David... I know you can't make it brush...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 27, 2007 at 6:22 am
Yes, I know that statistics are independent of indexes... but think of stats as automatically generated indexes...
Can't believe that MS recommended turning them off... Look's like I have a little...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 26, 2007 at 7:19 am
WHERE ','+@strApplicationIDs+',' LIKE '%,'+CAST(ApplicationID AS VARCHAR(10)+',%'
Index usage is certainly not possible using this method...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 24, 2007 at 11:35 pm
Hmmm... anyone know of any disadvantages of specifying VARCHAR(MAX) for everywhere a varchar is needed?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 24, 2007 at 11:08 am
Viewing 15 posts - 56,686 through 56,700 (of 59,069 total)