Viewing 15 posts - 56,671 through 56,685 (of 59,069 total)
I, for one, have enjoyed the simple yet educated rhetoric spawned by this editorial. The reason for most of the passion displayed is likely because of personal experience and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 30, 2007 at 10:27 pm
Heh... yeah... how silly of me to think it might have been an SQL Server question on an SQL Server forum... not enough coffee and I missed that... thanks, Julie.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 30, 2007 at 10:14 pm
I'm thinking that we should keep "real" religion out of this...
By the way, I did find my iron ![]()
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 30, 2007 at 6:44 am
Yep... strayed just a bit... I think Peter meant "would a CLR be an appropriate place to build a function"? If not, that's the way I took it and I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 30, 2007 at 6:37 am
Outstanding! Thanks for the feedback!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 29, 2007 at 5:22 pm
Agreed... WHEN you have an application... and if you save the data into a table with the correct decimal data type, takes no time at all.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 29, 2007 at 6:53 am
Thanks Ken... haven't had the opportunity to work with 2005 to any great extent. Appreciate the time you took to explain it.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 29, 2007 at 6:41 am
You bet, Pam. Let us know how it works out.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 29, 2007 at 6:05 am
Yep... it is strange... the function does Index Seeks on the 2 part index and the outer Select that uses the function does and Index Scan because it's looking at...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 29, 2007 at 5:57 am
I know squat about CLR's... can you call a proc in a CLR?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 29, 2007 at 5:48 am
Ah... sorry. Didn't read the whole thing.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 29, 2007 at 5:40 am
Actually, I did that... and a couple of other renditions, as well.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 28, 2007 at 10:07 pm
Nope... it doesn't... I tested it. See my previous...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 28, 2007 at 8:14 pm
There's really only one way to get performance out of this code...
Without modification, the original query/function on only 10,000 rows takes 19 seconds and Antares' takes 17. On 20,000 rows, the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 28, 2007 at 7:34 pm
Um... I think you really need to use the DBCC proc I told you about as part of normal maintenance, anyway.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 28, 2007 at 4:58 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 56,671 through 56,685 (of 59,069 total)