Viewing 15 posts - 54,121 through 54,135 (of 59,072 total)
I've found is that in some cases one is much better than the other two
In what way? Not necessarily looking for an example, but how were they better?
CTE is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 5:38 pm
Vivien Xing (11/13/2007)
Comparing query performance from different server/SQL edition? It is supposed to compare based on the same server setting/configuration.
Isn't that like saying two different size dump trucks...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 5:30 pm
Guess I'm just gonna have to document that proc from BOL... 😛
Andy, what the max number of parts a given assembly can have? There's a reason why I ask......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 7:40 am
Grumpy... looks like you have PM disabled. Wanted to send you my cell phone number. Might be fun to get together and do some 12 ounce curls wilst...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 7:36 am
HOLY SON OF A .. %&@$#@ !!!!
I never imagined the recursive CTE would be perform so poorly...
Heh... my work is almost done here...
Peter, did you have some...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 7:32 am
... and what happened to the Cross-Apply Peter was talking about?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 7:29 am
Yes, I used the tally table (or as you named it (myNumbers).
I didn't realize you wanted the Clustered index removed for the test.
So the new results with the PK...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 7:26 am
This is starting to be a little like pulling teeth, Phamm...
Why does the report need to be in this format? No fair saying the users want it that way......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 7:02 am
Jason,
Did you test only the Tally table method? Sorry, I can't really tell from your post...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 6:29 am
You're getting a "scan" on the Tally table? Did you remove the Clustered Index it had?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 6:27 am
On which method, Peter?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 5:51 am
Took the words right out of my mouth... prize for participants and casual observers alike will be more knowledge. "Some of the best 'Things' in life are not 'Things'"...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 5:49 am
Cool... now we're talking some testing!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 5:46 am
Seriously, Phamm...
I just wanna know before-hand for 2 reasons... will determine the method I use and I'm collecting "reasons" for this... just explain why you need to do this. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 5:43 am
Did you find a link, Jonathon?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
November 13, 2007 at 5:39 am
Viewing 15 posts - 54,121 through 54,135 (of 59,072 total)