Viewing 15 posts - 52,516 through 52,530 (of 59,091 total)
Heh... dang... thanks Kevin! I should'a looked in BOL...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 9:49 pm
Matt Miller (2/15/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 11:38 am
J (2/15/2008)
Mr. Moden,I just set the options of the query analyzer as you suggested. Thanks a million for both:
1. a very useful suggestion
2. not laughing at my dumb error.
Regards
Thanks for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 11:36 am
Matt Miller (2/15/2008)
There's the obvious way, emulating a SQL-style cursor, which seems oh so very obvious. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 11:27 am
Frank,
Heh... understood on things possibly changing...
It's a bit funny... for years, people jumped on me for using the occasional undocumented feature (xp_DirTree to be specific) because "Microsoft could...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 11:17 am
TheSQLGuru (2/15/2008)
Kevin, do you, by any chance, have a Microsoft article...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 11:03 am
Heh... as you said... "Well!!!!"
What might be even more interesting is to find out what the CLR does "AAAAAAND" why you think you need a CLR to do...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 10:55 am
Since you didn't say what the datatype of the CSV column is, and since you said 2005", I can only assume the "worst". This would run much faster with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 10:29 am
So OK let's continue. Back to lengths. I'm not so concerned about limit of 30 symbols per identifier however, I'm quite amazed by following math in SQL Server:
select len(a), len(b),...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 8:57 am
You can also use the "3rd operand" of round which identifies whether the number should be rounded or truncated (as you've asked for)... the information for the 3rd operand is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 8:13 am
Heh... and I damned sure wouldn't have actually written the performance enabled code the way I did... I did that just to make cuff's match collar in the code performance...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2008 at 8:23 pm
Heh... I did look at the "Example C" code you referenced... guess that proves that even people who write the documentation can be card carrying members of the Darwin Award......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2008 at 8:17 pm
You've exemplified exactly what I was talking about, Gints... doesn't really matter what people think of one or the other, they are very different and anyone who thinks that the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2008 at 7:04 pm
The LEN failure is because you are missing a couple of right parenthesis in the code line.
Also, is there only 1 name per row or do they look like something...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2008 at 6:36 pm
Heh... I knew it would be YOU, Matt... after all the testing you did for/with me on the "other" CLR's, I should have just asked "Hey Matt... you wanna try...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 15, 2008 at 6:32 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 52,516 through 52,530 (of 59,091 total)