Viewing 15 posts - 52,486 through 52,500 (of 59,072 total)
How does one determine if a page split has occured during an update?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2008 at 8:43 am
erdem (2/17/2008)
Thank you very much for your replies...At least, you replied this question 🙂My final data report should include just six columns:
StockCode
SalesPrice1
SalesPrice2
.
.
SalesPrice5
That's all..
But, you didn't read my previous reply... you've...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2008 at 8:40 am
Hassie (2/17/2008)
Thanks alot - this did the job
You bet... Thanks for the feedback.
Just remember...if the count of rows for each group starts to grow, the performance will suffer greatly very...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2008 at 8:32 am
Peso (2/17/2008)
Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Line 1Invalid object name 'New.AddAnnex'.
Doh!... Thanks for the correction, Peter... that's what I get for late night posting. I'll correct that post...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2008 at 8:24 am
Yes, I absolutely agree... any type of formatting should be done only in the GUI... if there is one...
But the keyword in the title of the thread is "Show"......
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2008 at 8:21 am
C'mon... I know you're in a pinch but stop and think about it... we don't know what your SalesDetails detail table looks like, we know nothing about the data in...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 17, 2008 at 7:59 am
Oh... be careful, now... IsNumeric cannot be equated to IsAllDigits. IsNumeric will allow currency symbols, $, comma, decimal point, spaces, tabs, and a host of other individual characters. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 11:10 pm
This was a pretty interesting question with no responses and I have no idea of what the answer might be... anyone got any idea on this, at all?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 10:34 pm
... and when it comes to % of batch, it can still lie!
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 10:06 pm
EDIT:
I originally (incorrectly :blush: ) suggested do something like this... but, as Peso pointed out below, it's going to throw an error if table doesn't actually exist. My appologies...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 10:02 pm
OP has "left the building"... 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 9:51 pm
Heh... dang... thanks Kevin! I should'a looked in BOL...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 9:49 pm
Matt Miller (2/15/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 11:38 am
J (2/15/2008)
Mr. Moden,I just set the options of the query analyzer as you suggested. Thanks a million for both:
1. a very useful suggestion
2. not laughing at my dumb error.
Regards
Thanks for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 11:36 am
Matt Miller (2/15/2008)
There's the obvious way, emulating a SQL-style cursor, which seems oh so very obvious. ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 16, 2008 at 11:27 am
Viewing 15 posts - 52,486 through 52,500 (of 59,072 total)