Viewing 15 posts - 50,191 through 50,205 (of 59,099 total)
Agreed! You do have to be a bit "pipe" sensitive...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 11:32 am
Heh... you should see how a Cursor or While loop pans out... thin lines aren't always a good thing on the execution plan... 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 7:24 am
Yep... I understand that... but why does it work in SQL Server 2000? What is it that allows sp_AddExtendedProperty to add a row to sysProperties without, apparently, having to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 7:15 am
sqluser (5/29/2008)
Is it possible to use Dynamic Query in UDF?
If yes, tell me how to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 6:37 am
Jack,
Could you post some data in the form identified in the article in the URL listed in my signature, please? It'll help us give you a correct answer more...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 6:36 am
Heh... thanks for the plug, Jason.
Stk, if you can, you should probably avoid the many forms of recursion. Recursion is a form of hidden RBAR that's not much better...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 6:20 am
Mark's suggestion is good... if that's what you actually want to do. If not, could you give an example of what you're trying to do? I just wanna...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 4:49 am
Now... that brings up a very interesting question... I looked at sp_AddExtendedProperty and there's nothing in it that would enable the ability to modify system tables directly... even if you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 4:38 am
So, the question would be...
... are you allowed to use CLR's on your system?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 3, 2008 at 9:52 pm
Haven't found the precise example I'm looking for, yet, but I did find this one... it's why so many people think recursion is a good thing... 😉
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 3, 2008 at 7:17 pm
Sorry... forgot to post the results from above...
[font="Courier New"]SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 2469 ms, elapsed time = 2628 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 3, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Grant Fritchey (6/3/2008)
Amen to table variables and bad statistics. Especially table variables. I'd still love to see what Jeff's got on the subject.
I'm still trying to find the example with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 3, 2008 at 6:16 pm
Nicely done, Ken... gonna add this one to my toolbelt... Heh, gotta find some way to get rid of the cursor, though (it's just me 😀 )
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 3, 2008 at 5:48 pm
This field would indicate which table that user's entries are in.
For more reasons than I could ever put in this tiny space, that would open a can of serious...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 2, 2008 at 1:13 pm
You don't need to go the route of XML... see the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Test+Data/61572/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 2, 2008 at 1:05 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 50,191 through 50,205 (of 59,099 total)