Viewing 15 posts - 50,176 through 50,190 (of 59,091 total)
The software company that own the database program have restored the same backup onto their server and performed the upgrade with virtually no change to the database size.
I've not seen...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 3:39 pm
kappa (6/4/2008)
No?Gee, and I thought this was an easy one... :unsure:
Ok... I'll try to be gentle even with an attitude like that... 😉
You haven't provided enough information... why do you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 3:31 pm
noeld (6/3/2008)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 3:08 pm
THAT's why I sometimes get a bit angry with the folks that insist that everything must be done on the client side... server spends more time piping stuff over the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Hmmmm.... that food for thought. I'm gonna have to make an SP in master that does an update on sysProperties and label it as a system proc... it will...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Heh... or like my old DBA used to say... "Got resources? Use 'em!" 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 12:31 pm
Heh... they asked for data and table over there, too! Somebody eventually did it for him, though.
Glad you got an answer, Jack. And, I agree... Dense_Rank...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 12:22 pm
Agreed! You do have to be a bit "pipe" sensitive...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 11:32 am
Heh... you should see how a Cursor or While loop pans out... thin lines aren't always a good thing on the execution plan... 🙂
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 7:24 am
Yep... I understand that... but why does it work in SQL Server 2000? What is it that allows sp_AddExtendedProperty to add a row to sysProperties without, apparently, having to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 7:15 am
sqluser (5/29/2008)
Is it possible to use Dynamic Query in UDF?
If yes, tell me how to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 6:37 am
Jack,
Could you post some data in the form identified in the article in the URL listed in my signature, please? It'll help us give you a correct answer more...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 6:36 am
Heh... thanks for the plug, Jason.
Stk, if you can, you should probably avoid the many forms of recursion. Recursion is a form of hidden RBAR that's not much better...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 6:20 am
Mark's suggestion is good... if that's what you actually want to do. If not, could you give an example of what you're trying to do? I just wanna...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 4:49 am
Now... that brings up a very interesting question... I looked at sp_AddExtendedProperty and there's nothing in it that would enable the ability to modify system tables directly... even if you...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 4, 2008 at 4:38 am
Viewing 15 posts - 50,176 through 50,190 (of 59,091 total)