Viewing 15 posts - 50,206 through 50,220 (of 59,091 total)
Any chance of changing the design to something a bit more normal instead of storing seconds for hours, minutes, and seconds?
Also, what have you tried? Generally speaking, you should...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 1, 2008 at 8:23 pm
Spend %50-60 USD on SQL Server 2005 Developers edition... install it on your home PC. Start answering/verifying questions on this forum... you'll stay current.
But it does takes some...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 1, 2008 at 5:08 pm
Um... is [DC-Base] the changing part number you're referring to? And, if so, what is the datatype of that column?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 1, 2008 at 4:56 pm
Ronnie.Doggart (6/1/2008)
HiWhen you say I/O output problem do you mean network bandwidth ?
Ronnie
Yep... that and recompiles... because of the 1=1 trick to make it easier to form a WHERE clause,...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
June 1, 2008 at 10:26 am
Which sites did you try that you were disappointed with?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 31, 2008 at 4:33 pm
Just because a proc may run more than once concurrently, I try to never name constraints on temp tables.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 31, 2008 at 4:17 pm
David.Poole (5/31/2008)
Before I die I am going to do that ride.
Or, maybe in the process 😀
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 31, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Thanks for the links and info, Tom... I'll take a look.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 31, 2008 at 4:06 pm
You certainly don't need any prefixes to make them run. So far as not being able to tell what the views are used for, that's thanks to the lack...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 31, 2008 at 10:36 am
Ok... I'm just going to go ahead and guess you meant "shrinking" TempDB... 😉
Yes... you may shrink the "files" associated with TempDB as you would any other database. It...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 31, 2008 at 10:28 am
Yes... here's the syntax from Books Online (comes free with SQL Server)...
SET IDENTITY_INSERT [ database. [ owner. ] ] { table } { ON | OFF }
... but, generally, there's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 31, 2008 at 10:18 am
adshisode85 (5/30/2008)
1 6
2 7
3 ...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 31, 2008 at 10:09 am
Howdy folks,
Someone who wishes to remain anonymous, send me an email asking the following questions related to this article. I've not worked with SQL Server 2008 (shoot, I'm just...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 30, 2008 at 10:43 pm
I don't believe anything is missing... just alter the column like I did... don't mess with the constraint or the default.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 30, 2008 at 9:28 pm
karthikeyan (5/30/2008)
1) what is the best size of TempDB ? The answer may be 'it depends',But if anybody added some valid points then...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
May 30, 2008 at 7:45 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 50,206 through 50,220 (of 59,091 total)