Viewing 15 posts - 4,861 through 4,875 (of 59,089 total)
I'm thinking the OP may have gotten an answer from somewhere else and so may no longer be interest in an answer from this thread and certainly not one where...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 13, 2021 at 4:06 am
Hi Jeff.
your tally table approach to parsing is the best i've seen. i have a real world problem; wondering if you have any thoughts.
i need to parse a large...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 13, 2021 at 3:18 am
Exceptionally busy next few days coming, but I did rebuild this morning, set a trace, and did check once to find 0.04% fragmentation - not the usual leap to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2021 at 5:24 pm
Hello,
I have a code that suppose to give me weekly(summed) payments, but instead, it gives me random points, not (1*7, 2*7,...)
I suspect it maybe because it doesn't include the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2021 at 5:19 pm
Hi Jeff.
your tally table approach to parsing is the best i've seen. i have a real world problem; wondering if you have any thoughts.
i need to parse a large...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2021 at 5:10 pm
There are some caveats to that should've been mentioned. The string is declared as NVARCHAR(MAX) because I don't know that that's not appropriate. The ordinal splitter is name '%8K_LEAD'...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2021 at 2:52 pm
Thank you, Steve. greatly appreciated!
Ah, be careful. He may not be correct here.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2021 at 2:50 pm
Hi Jeff.
your tally table approach to parsing is the best i've seen. i have a real world problem; wondering if you have any thoughts.
i need to parse a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 11, 2021 at 2:49 pm
FWIW: This is not a end of the world scenario - this is a rarely used - 1 select every few minutes or so.
I just got curious when I...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2021 at 7:46 pm
Thanks for the feedback, Grant. I am concerned. While I wouldn't expect such a thing to be "radical" in a test and development environment, seeing "some"...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2021 at 7:32 pm
Still not quite right. The MAX datatypes (LOBs) ARE actually allowed in RowStore indexes. They're allowed in INCLUDEs, just not as a key.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2021 at 4:08 pm
@vscurtis...
Still waiting to hear which version of SQL Server you're using.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2021 at 4:03 pm
First, what index level are you looking at in sys.dm_db_index_physical stats? If it's not level "0" and it's not "IN ROW DATA", you can mostly forget about it.
Before we move...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2021 at 3:46 pm
p.s. I contacted the Web Master to restore the post I accidentally hit "Report" on .
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2021 at 3:39 pm
Thanks for the feedback, Grant. I am concerned. While I wouldn't expect such a thing to be "radical" in a test and development environment, seeing "some" thrash and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
August 9, 2021 at 3:24 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 4,861 through 4,875 (of 59,089 total)