Viewing 15 posts - 45,376 through 45,390 (of 59,101 total)
Helen, you're new. Help us help you. Take a moment and read the article at the link in my signature below. Thanks.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:57 pm
Actually, I didn't wait...
Did you drop an recreate the table with the new data? Both solutions I posted return A 3 for the new data.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:54 pm
dubem1 (1/31/2009)
I try your code and found it not really do what I want because if you have this (the following show the 10 last exam result code of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:47 pm
This is untested because you provided no table structure nor any readily consumable data in the form of INSERT statements... for future posts, please see the link in my signature....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:45 pm
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
Sorry Jeff. 🙂 There is some good stuff there...
Heh... NP... just remember when it happens, the Force flows in more than 1 direction. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:27 pm
Marios Philippopoulos (1/31/2009)
There are two puzzling aspects...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:26 pm
dubem1 (1/31/2009)
I am glad you had fun with the article. I am surely not at this level!
I cannot give you a lot more information on the purpose of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:20 pm
sandy (1/30/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:09 pm
Vladan, check your code... I don't believe it's coming up with the correct result set. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 7:47 pm
You can use a While loop if you want... but I wouldn't... 😉 See the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63003/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 7:11 pm
ammarghanem921 (1/31/2009)
I do have One stored procedure that calls other stored procedures, each on which might call another stored procedure. However, am making begin transaction, commit transaction and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 7:06 pm
Isn't there something missing from that JOIN? Like a table or somthing and an equation?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 7:02 pm
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 6:58 pm
Jeff Moden (1/31/2009)
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 6:54 pm
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 6:53 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 45,376 through 45,390 (of 59,101 total)