Viewing 15 posts - 45,376 through 45,390 (of 59,095 total)
dubem1 (1/31/2009)
I am glad you had fun with the article. I am surely not at this level!
I cannot give you a lot more information on the purpose of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:20 pm
sandy (1/30/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:09 pm
Vladan, check your code... I don't believe it's coming up with the correct result set. π
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 7:47 pm
You can use a While loop if you want... but I wouldn't... π See the following...
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/T-SQL/63003/
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 7:11 pm
ammarghanem921 (1/31/2009)
I do have One stored procedure that calls other stored procedures, each on which might call another stored procedure. However, am making begin transaction, commit transaction and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 7:06 pm
Isn't there something missing from that JOIN? Like a table or somthing and an equation?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 7:02 pm
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 6:58 pm
Jeff Moden (1/31/2009)
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 6:54 pm
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 6:53 pm
On that note, all I can do
is raise my mug into the air
and say "3 cheers to SSC"
and to all of those that care! π
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 6:49 pm
I ran into an interesting article... glad to see that "big money" hasn't changed Steve a bit since then except that he continues to just keep making it better and...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Heh... "Don't use undocumented features"... as opposed to what? Using just the documented ones? You mean like the wonderful and heavily documented sp_MakeWebTask whose required privs changed overnight...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 6:36 pm
It depends on whether or not you believe in the myth of portable code. TOP is an SQL Server manifestation.
Other than that, "best", in my book, is the one...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 5:50 pm
Heh... Barry graduated from the school of "Right Now" and teaches from the good book of "Boy Howdy!" π
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 5:39 pm
Dyamond (1/31/2009)
Hello, I'm trying to keep together/group on the following:SELECT date,name,desc,βCodeβ as cdDesc
FROM activity
WHERE date = β2009-01-05' and site = β80' and
code in (β55544',β33333', β66666')
I'm a bit thick on...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 45,376 through 45,390 (of 59,095 total)