Viewing 15 posts - 45,361 through 45,375 (of 59,095 total)
Marios Philippopoulos (2/1/2009)
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
Marios Philippopoulos (1/31/2009)
I have a trigger that appears to execute a very large number of logical reads; on one occasion it has hit 73,421,728 logical reads!
Is this...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 1, 2009 at 8:19 am
Dyamond (2/1/2009)
Thanks for responding, but it still isn't working.
Table
Date, Name, Desc, Code
1/05/09, Test 1, This is Test 1, 55544
1/05/09, Test 1, This is Test 2, 33333
1/05/09, Test 1, This...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
February 1, 2009 at 7:59 am
Perfect. 🙂 Miller time? :w00t:
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Ah... true enough.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 9:22 pm
BWAA-HAAA! Oh, you said "chops". 😛
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 9:17 pm
dubem1 (1/31/2009)
I can this select return only a single row, with the most recent result code?
Sure... just like you can in the first. Just add a condition to the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 9:14 pm
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
alim.shaikh (1/31/2009)
unfortunately, sql server doesn't provide array since it is not a full fledge programming language...
This is incorrect on two counts. first, SQL is a "full-fledged" programming language....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 9:10 pm
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
Marios Philippopoulos (1/31/2009)
I have a trigger that appears to execute a very large number of logical reads; [font="Arial Black"]on one occasion [/font]it has hit 73,421,728 logical reads!
Is this for...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 9:03 pm
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
dastagirid (1/30/2009)
i used .net c# .here i created one array. that array have two values ..
There are lots of ways to do it, but for two values, they aren't...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 9:00 pm
Helen, you're new. Help us help you. Take a moment and read the article at the link in my signature below. Thanks.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:57 pm
Actually, I didn't wait...
Did you drop an recreate the table with the new data? Both solutions I posted return A 3 for the new data.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:54 pm
dubem1 (1/31/2009)
I try your code and found it not really do what I want because if you have this (the following show the 10 last exam result code of...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:47 pm
This is untested because you provided no table structure nor any readily consumable data in the form of INSERT statements... for future posts, please see the link in my signature....
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:45 pm
RBarryYoung (1/31/2009)
Sorry Jeff. 🙂 There is some good stuff there...
Heh... NP... just remember when it happens, the Force flows in more than 1 direction. 😉
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:27 pm
Marios Philippopoulos (1/31/2009)
There are two puzzling aspects...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
January 31, 2009 at 8:26 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 45,361 through 45,375 (of 59,095 total)