Viewing 15 posts - 40,831 through 40,845 (of 59,102 total)
I'm not sure how fast the methods in that article are but I do know the method used in the following forum response is nasty fast and can easily be...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 10:20 am
I think that one of the keys here is that you want to be able to dp the following...
My goals are not to become just an IT/Programmer but someone with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 10:08 am
Paul White (12/4/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 9:54 am
I like the all-in-one aspects of SSMS... what I don't like is all the functionality that is no longer available. Things like easily being able to do a multiple...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 9:47 am
ezhil-649633 (12/3/2009)
But, i want to know whether the same can be achieved through corelated subqueries. If, yes how to achieve that?
For a finite number of levels, probably. For an...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 9:39 am
How do you know the field is being cut off at 255 characters? By looking at it in Query Analyzer? If so, the default for Query Analyzer is...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 9:21 am
Heh... it's not a fault... it's a feature! Makes it real easy to look good by doing a "performance improvement". 😛
Actually, I'm tickled at the response, Paul. I've...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 9:00 am
james.hp123 (12/5/2009)
Char is a fixed-length data type, the storage size of the char value is equal to the maximum size for the column.
varchar is a variable-length data...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 8:53 am
RandMan-585256 (12/4/2009)
Jeff Moden (12/3/2009)
RandMan-585256 (12/3/2009)
Since this is Access VBA why don't you use the cross-tab query type in Access?
Hmmm.... not a bad idea. Do you believe that it would...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 12:12 am
So! What say yea, Sam!?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 5, 2009 at 12:03 am
CirquedeSQLeil (12/4/2009)
You mean I can't run SQL Server on Knoppix and fail replication over to the subscriber on an as-needed basis?:-P:-D
Damn! I was hoping to run it on a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 4, 2009 at 11:46 pm
Robert Davis (12/4/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 4, 2009 at 11:43 pm
Rob Fisk (12/2/2009)
alex-743051 (12/2/2009)
I just can use VBA in the Excel worksheet to perform same task:
I've used similar in the past but it does not cover the fact that with...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 4, 2009 at 1:30 pm
nigel. (12/4/2009)
izhar-azati (12/4/2009)
Try:SELECT * FROM #product
WHERE ','+catid+',' like '%,1,%'
Yes, that would do it too. But proper normalization would be better, as Jeff recommends (if possible).
I guess my attempt at...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 4, 2009 at 8:13 am
GSquared (12/4/2009)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
December 4, 2009 at 7:47 am
Viewing 15 posts - 40,831 through 40,845 (of 59,102 total)