Viewing 15 posts - 37,711 through 37,725 (of 59,072 total)
Awesome feedback. As a side bar... Heh... no appologies for wanting to for wanting to form an opinion on some things on my own (which I still have to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 4:38 pm
Almost forgot... thanks for the warning on Rule 6, Tom. I haven't seen anyone address the "problem" you're talking about but I suspect that the word "View" in that...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 12:34 am
Thanks, Tom. Yep... this is one of the many versions of seen. Obviously I was hoping for the real thing but if someone like you, Barry Young, or...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 13, 2010 at 12:32 am
CirquedeSQLeil (7/11/2010)
Steve Jones - Editor (7/11/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 12, 2010 at 2:03 am
Jack Corbett (7/11/2010)
Jeff Moden (7/9/2010)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 12, 2010 at 1:55 am
Jim McLeod (7/12/2010)
It's referenced in the ACM digital library:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=655234
But...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 12, 2010 at 1:27 am
David Portas (7/12/2010)
http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/icde/Codd86.html
That's the rebublished version of the Computerworld article.
The...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 12, 2010 at 1:25 am
Absolutely wonderful editorial, Steve. Unfortunately, I've found that many IT shops ARE exactly the same as some water and electric companies... you can't actually get to anything with a...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2010 at 11:35 pm
lmu92 (7/11/2010)
Please note that there a few people around (including myself, usually) who expect sample data in a ready to use format (as...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2010 at 11:24 pm
m.dunster (7/11/2010)
I've managed to successfully adapt this to solve my problem. Now I'll have to spend some time trying to understand exactly what is happening.
Point noted about the data provision.
Many...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2010 at 11:23 pm
rvasanth (7/10/2010)
You have to use cursorUse the sysobjects table to get the list of table.
Then loop through one by one and check for the condition you want
Anyone can say such...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2010 at 3:19 pm
lmu92 (7/11/2010)
I'm not sure how the functions to_char and to_date are written, but I guess both can be replaced by the built-in function CONVERT(). The...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2010 at 3:16 pm
lmu92 (9/6/2009)
Would the following give the expected result?SELECT DATEDIFF(dd,0,GETDATE())
However, it's interesting that EXCEL returns 40062 for today (2009-09-06), but SQL Server returns 40060...
The "0" date for for the default date...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2010 at 3:07 pm
m.dunster (7/11/2010)
I've managed to successfully adapt this to solve my problem. Now I'll have to spend some time trying to understand exactly what is happening.
Point noted about the data provision.
Many...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2010 at 2:58 pm
I agree with Lutz. The subject is much to large to put into a simple post. The only way for you to become wise and expert on the...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
July 11, 2010 at 2:54 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 37,711 through 37,725 (of 59,072 total)