Viewing 15 posts - 15,271 through 15,285 (of 59,097 total)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 3, 2017 at 7:47 am
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 3, 2017 at 7:40 am
Sounds like you're taking all the right steps. There are a couple of things that may be an issue. The first is whatever monitoring software you're using. I've seen such...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 3, 2017 at 12:46 am
I hate answers like "You must restart the SQL Server instance" (emphasis is mine) on multiple choice question especially when there is more than one choice because you don't...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 8:58 pm
Have you checked for simple but lengthy blocking and deadlocks?
I'd also be concerned about the nearly flat 30% CPU usage you're seeing.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 8:33 pm
Just a couple of personal notes not covered in the article...
I certainly can't speak for anyone else but I find the ISDATE() function to have the same problems...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 7:49 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 7:20 pm
My recommendation would be to use an "External Data Source" in the spreadsheet rather than trying to write your own in VBA.
Other than that, you may have to...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 7:00 pm
NUMERIC(19,0) works just fine for this. It does take 1 extra byte and a small bit of extra time compared to BIGINT wherever and whenever it's used but it works...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 6:48 pm
When you do your weekly dumps, are the IDs always larger than the largest ID in the dbo.Temp table or not?
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 6:27 pm
Heh... and then there's string literals, which may also contain things like the word "Employee", which could be the name of a table.,
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 6:11 pm
It would be much easier to help you resolve this if you provided some readily consumable test data. See the first link in my signature line for how to do...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 5:39 pm
CREATE PROCEDURE SP_MAINASBEGIN-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra...--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 5:36 pm
You can have a HEAP with a PK because a PK does not have to be a clustered index.
Shifting gears, yes... I've seen the problem that you describe...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 5:33 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 5:05 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 15,271 through 15,285 (of 59,097 total)