Viewing 15 posts - 15,286 through 15,300 (of 59,097 total)
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 5:01 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 8:53 am
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 8:46 am
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 2, 2017 at 8:08 am
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 9:33 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 9:17 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 9:11 pm
If you don't want to go the table-partitioning route, then write a proc to move items to accumulator tables on a daily basis and delete them from the mains. Once...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 8:48 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 8:46 pm
I guess I'll have to disagree if TempDB is on a SAN. Unless you can guarantee that the MDF and LDF files are guaranteed to be on separate spindles, there's...
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 8:41 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 8:38 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 8:20 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 8:15 pm
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
April 1, 2017 at 8:12 pm
Yes... you need a MERGE of partitions before you can drop a filegroup that's involved in the partitioning.
--Jeff Moden
Change is inevitable... Change for the better is not.
March 31, 2017 at 7:58 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 15,286 through 15,300 (of 59,097 total)