Viewing 15 posts - 17,116 through 17,130 (of 19,564 total)
Nice Article.
Thanks
February 19, 2010 at 11:12 am
The backward compatibility in this scenario is "SQL Authentication." If you never use SQL Authentication, you would not need to use SA either. MS is trying to have...
February 19, 2010 at 10:59 am
paul.goldstraw (2/19/2010)
February 19, 2010 at 10:29 am
Grant Fritchey (2/19/2010)
Jack Corbett (2/19/2010)
CirquedeSQLeil (2/18/2010)
When will we see books from Jack, Lynn and Gus?
I've considered it, but I've also talked to people who have done it (Grant being one)...
February 19, 2010 at 10:25 am
When will we see books from Jack, Lynn and Gus?
February 18, 2010 at 9:02 pm
AndrewSQLDBA (2/18/2010)
Create a simple SQL user...
February 18, 2010 at 8:46 pm
Interesting site bouncing around twitter today by the MVPs.
Decided to check out
signed up under http://sqlrnnr.uservoice.com
February 18, 2010 at 6:29 pm
Woohoo - finally made it to 5000 :w00t:
February 18, 2010 at 5:13 pm
isuckatsql (2/18/2010)
In the activity monitor on the Server i have Waiting Tasks(7)....whatever that means ?I have Waiting Tasks(0) on the desktop.
Waiting Tasks
The number of tasks that are waiting for processor,...
February 18, 2010 at 5:12 pm
Gail, Barry, and Elliott have put it very succinctly.
If you really want slightly different performance from one of the system procs, create on of your own that fills that requirement...
February 18, 2010 at 5:05 pm
Robert Davis (2/18/2010)
Forget DBCC TimeWarp. I just discovered DBCC PayIncrease.:-P
ahh but DBCC Payincrease requires DBCC Timewarp in order to function properly.
February 18, 2010 at 4:59 pm
dennisengel (2/18/2010)
Step 1: I had restored these databases to another server from backups, and kept business going. I has good...
February 18, 2010 at 4:10 pm
GilaMonster (2/18/2010)
GT-897544 (2/18/2010)
GilaMonster (2/18/2010)
GT-897544 (2/18/2010)
If that is the status values for suspect databases. Looks like it is a clean shut down, no corrupt files.
It's not.
Cleanly shutdown is indicated by...
February 18, 2010 at 3:53 pm
ss-457805 (2/18/2010)
i have reported it.. Hopefully this will get deleted soon.
As the posts now stand - no violation of NDA has occurred. I wouldn't sweat it.
February 18, 2010 at 3:29 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 17,116 through 17,130 (of 19,564 total)