Viewing 15 posts - 19,516 through 19,530 (of 19,562 total)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb677167.aspx
this microsoft provided link states that they were erroneous in which versions support automatic page repair.
both standard and Enterprise editions support it.
July 8, 2009 at 3:55 pm
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb677167.aspx
this microsoft provided link states that they were erroneous in which versions support automatic page repair.
both standard and Enterprise editions support it.
July 8, 2009 at 3:13 pm
1. Disk volumes need to be defragged.
2. I prefer PerfectDisk (defraggler seems to work nicely too) - both are faster than Diskeeper, and all three are many times...
July 8, 2009 at 2:00 pm
1. Disk volumes need to be defragged.
2. I prefer PerfectDisk (defraggler seems to work nicely too) - both are faster than Diskeeper, and all three are many times...
July 8, 2009 at 2:00 pm
1. Disk volumes need to be defragged.
2. I prefer PerfectDisk (defraggler seems to work nicely too) - both are faster than Diskeeper, and all three are many times...
July 8, 2009 at 1:59 pm
1. Disk volumes need to be defragged.
2. I prefer PerfectDisk (defraggler seems to work nicely too) - both are faster than Diskeeper, and all three are many times...
July 8, 2009 at 1:53 pm
1. Disk volumes need to be defragged.
2. I prefer PerfectDisk (defraggler seems to work nicely too) - both are faster than Diskeeper, and all three are many times...
July 8, 2009 at 1:48 pm
1. Disk volumes need to be defragged.
2. I prefer PerfectDisk (defraggler seems to work nicely too) - both are faster than Diskeeper, and all three are many times...
July 8, 2009 at 1:47 pm
1. Disk volumes need to be defragged.
2. I prefer PerfectDisk (defraggler seems to work nicely too) - both are faster than Diskeeper, and all three are many times...
July 8, 2009 at 1:46 pm
1. Disk volumes need to be defragged.
2. I prefer PerfectDisk (defraggler seems to work nicely too) - both are faster than Diskeeper, and all three are many times...
July 8, 2009 at 1:46 pm
We use a similar setup for the explicit purpose of being able to easily move databases and instances from one server to another should the need arise.
I would recommend that...
July 7, 2009 at 1:47 pm
I agree with Lynn on the NOLOCK hint. Too many places have mandated the NOLOCK on all Select statements. This is one that should have a proceed with...
July 1, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Forgot to add to the post that DB optimization is not found in the filegroup solution alone - but can be a piece of the puzzle. In short, I...
July 1, 2009 at 4:37 pm
Having recently done the same thing (and still in progress)
Here are some useful scripts:
Script 1 - determine LOBs per filegroup
select fg=filegroup_name(a.data_space_id), tbl=object_name(p.object_id), idx=i.name
from sys.allocation_units a
inner join sys.partitions p
on p.partition_id =...
July 1, 2009 at 4:35 pm
Why does it concern you? You may have moved all the user database objects out of the Primary filegroup, but that is where the system database objects reside, and...
July 1, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 19,516 through 19,530 (of 19,562 total)