Viewing 15 posts - 6,001 through 6,015 (of 6,105 total)
It sounds like your files are being kept on the filesystem and not as BLOBs. Is this correct? As Andy asked, what does SQL Server do in this configuration?
K....
October 12, 2001 at 7:15 am
Yes, indeed. I think the realization that many who were MCSEs had not completed recertification (myself included) would not do so by Dec 31 finally caused them to relook...
October 12, 2001 at 6:45 am
Just so we're on the same page (using 2 servers, extrapolate for more)...
Active/Passive - 2 servers, 1 actively responding to requests addressed to the virtual server, the other in standby...
October 6, 2001 at 12:21 am
quote:
the prob is that the proc is deleting the recs but not inserting it into the archives table
October 6, 2001 at 12:07 am
This is a particularly alarming statement:
quote:
I have a stopred prodedure with a transaction in it , which includes some static and dynamically...
October 5, 2001 at 11:57 pm
If you're following Microsoft's recommended security document (assuming you're using IIS), your IIS box basically doesn't talk via UDP and you limit the TCP ports to what the web server...
October 3, 2001 at 11:26 pm
When you say you'd like to mix the two queries, I'm thinking you want to take all the rows in SQL Server that aren't found in the progress database and...
October 1, 2001 at 3:56 pm
Also, how are you configured to talk to that server from the client? Named Pipes or TCP/IP? Make sure in Client Network Utility that TCP/IP is set higher...
September 26, 2001 at 1:53 pm
Here in the US, though, certification isn't a guarantee of skill. We saw a trend where the bootcamps were getting very successful at training people to pass the exams,...
September 26, 2001 at 1:48 pm
For the first part, a string > 4000 characters, you've always got the option of the text data type.
As for union, the sort is going to be on...
September 26, 2001 at 1:33 pm
We don't have any of the commercial packages, so I ended up writing a DTS job that checks once an hour for servers in a given list. It tries...
September 21, 2001 at 9:13 am
About the only thing I've found that even comes to close doesn't really. However, you may have a look at the operations guide:
K. Brian Kelley
September 19, 2001 at 7:27 pm
I believe the limitation in 6.5 for varchar was 255. It increased to 8000 in version 7.0. So you can't explicitly increase the varchar size past the limit.
K....
September 17, 2001 at 11:48 am
That's what it must be. I think I'm still on SP1.
K. Brian Kelley
September 14, 2001 at 8:07 am
Yup. My goof. My brain processed ROWCOUNT because he wanted n rows.
K. Brian Kelley
September 13, 2001 at 10:10 am
Viewing 15 posts - 6,001 through 6,015 (of 6,105 total)