I got it right - more luck then judgement though.
I am just curious of peoples views on the terminology.
Seems to start of with using the term revert - but then they have to use the restore command so they start to talk about restore.
In my view this shouldnt really be termed a restore as alone the snapshot cannot be used to restore the database (this is correct isnt it?), however if you have a database and a snapshot you can revert the database to the snapshot.
I think this makes sense this way round - only muddied by the fact that you still have to run the restore command.
Obviously what you dont want is some newbie doing snapshots thinking they can restore a snapshot on failure.